IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Setyl · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Setyl

15Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Setyl was named 8 times in ITAM, where Snipe-IT led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In itam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Setyl for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
IT asset managementIT operations and endpoint7%6 of 610%8under 10 labels · led by Snipe-IT at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Setyl yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Setyl across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash21003
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.510102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labels2
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Setyl: Excellent for unifying hardware, software, and remote employee logistics with modern integrations and per-user pricing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · scale prompt · first choice
“I would recommend starting with Setyl or ManageEngine AssetExplorer” MiniMax M2.5 · ITAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Modern B2B & Compliance: Setyl” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · direct prompt · first choice
“Best for Modern, Distributed/Remote Workforces: Setyl” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Setyl, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Setyl was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Freshservice10 of 153Not in the top three
Snipe-IT10 of 151Not in the top three
ManageEngine AssetExplorer7 of 152Not in the top three
Asset Panda7 of 150Not in the top three
BlueTally7 of 150Not in the top three
InvGate Asset Management6 of 150Not in the top three
Rippling IT5 of 152Not in the top three
Lansweeper5 of 150Not in the top three
ServiceNow IT Asset Management5 of 150Not in the top three
Torii4 of 150Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Setyl. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 15 answers that named Setyl and are not a share of its labels.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Setyl's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Setyl, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at setyl.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.