IT AI Index

Index › Products › SentinelOne Vigilance Respond · October 2026 Edition

SentinelOne · 1 category · Named, not ranked

SentinelOne Vigilance Respond

8Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SentinelOne Vigilance Respond was named 3 times in MDR, where Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business35 of 48

under the label threshold

Mid-market60 of 67

under the label threshold

Enterprise29 of 67

under the label threshold

In mdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SentinelOne Vigilance Respond for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Managed detection and response	Security operations	0%	60 of 67	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response at 37%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, SentinelOne Vigilance Respond held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · MDR · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 of 42, unchanged

Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 58 of 65, unchanged

EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 47 of 60, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
MDR	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 60 of 67, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated SentinelOne Vigilance Respond across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Existing SentinelOne Singularity customers” DeepSeek V4 Flash · MDR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“more suited to mid‑market with larger budgets” GLM 4.7 FlashX · MDR · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SentinelOne Vigilance Respond, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SentinelOne Vigilance Respond was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response7 of 81Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete6 of 84Not among the top eight

Sophos MDR6 of 81Not among the top eight

Rapid7 MDR4 of 81Not among the top eight

Huntress Managed EDR3 of 82Not among the top eight

Expel MDR3 of 80Not among the top eight

Red Canary3 of 80Not among the top eight

Unit 42 Managed Detection and Response2 of 80Not among the top eight

Mandiant (Google Cloud) MDR1 of 81Not among the top eight

Blackpoint Cyber1 of 80Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SentinelOne Vigilance Respond. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named SentinelOne Vigilance Respond and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

huntress.com6

checkthat.ai5

sentinelone.comYour site5

underdefense.com5

crowdstrike.com4

intezer.com4

kaseya.com4

mdrproviders.io4

rapid7.com4

cynet.com3

Thirty-nine of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming SentinelOne Vigilance Respond came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-managed-detection-and-response-solutions5

huntress.com/cybersecurity-insights/managed-detection-response-vendors5

kaseya.com/blog/best-mdr-providers4

mdrproviders.io/providers/size/enterprise4

rapid7.com/fundamentals/top-mdr-providers4

underdefense.com/blog/top-6-managed-detection-and-response-mdr-providers4

crowdstrike.com/en-us/compare/crowdstrike-vs-sentinelone3

cynet.com/security-foundations/managed-detection-and-response/mdr-solutions-why-they-are-c3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow SentinelOne Vigilance Respond

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SentinelOne is the company behind SentinelOne Vigilance Respond.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from SentinelOne: SentinelOne Attivo, SentinelOne Identity, SentinelOne Prompt Security, SentinelOne Purple AI, SentinelOne Singularity, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, SentinelOne Singularity Core, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint and 5 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Readiness helps customers get the maximum return on investment from a SentinelOne subscription.
sentinelone.com/resources/datasheets/vigilance-readiness-mdr-datasheet
Not stated on the pages read: Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What SentinelOne Vigilance Respond's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: university.sentinelone.com/courses/instructor-led-sentinelone-incident-response, sentinelone.com/resources/datasheets/vigilance-readiness-mdr-datasheet, sentinelone.com/resources/datasheets/vigilance-readiness-mdr-datasheet-2, sentinelone.com/es/resources/datasheets/vigilance-respond, sentinelone.com/it/resources/datasheets/vigilance-respond. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SentinelOne Vigilance Respond's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SentinelOne Vigilance Respond, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SentinelOne Vigilance Respond by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SentinelOne Vigilance Respond is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SentinelOne Vigilance Respond, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.