Every category where a model named Rapid7 MDR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Managed detection and response	Security operations	0%	11 of 45	0%	17	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Rapid7 MDR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Rapid7 MDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	3
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative17 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strong performer in mid-market & enterprise MDR; noted for tight integration with its vulnerability-management suite.” MiniMax M2.5 · MDR · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Teams already using Rapid7 tools (InsightIDR) or wanting unlimited coverage” Kimi K2 · MDR · direct prompt · alternative

“Strong cloud and identity coverage; suitable for organizations already using Rapid7.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · MDR · comparative prompt · alternative

“if you want flexible coverage and pricing that scales by endpoints/assets” GPT-5.4 mini · MDR · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rapid7 MDR, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rapid7 MDR was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response34 of 379Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete27 of 3713Not in the top three

Sophos MDR25 of 373Not in the top three

Huntress Managed EDR18 of 375Not in the top three

Expel18 of 371Not in the top three

Red Canary18 of 371Not in the top three

eSentire15 of 370Not in the top three

SentinelOne Singularity MDR12 of 371Not in the top three

Unit 42 Managed Detection and Response11 of 370Not in the top three

Ontinue8 of 370Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rapid7 MDR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 37 answers that named Rapid7 MDR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gbhackers.com19

rapid7.comYour site19

learn.g2.com16

cybersecuritynews.com15

cyberpress.org12

gartner.com12

huntress.com12

mdrproviders.io11

paloaltonetworks.com11

corporatevision-news.com10

118 of the 137 domain citations in answers naming Rapid7 MDR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gbhackers.com/best-mdr-services-compared19

learn.g2.com/top-mdr-providers16

rapid7.com/fundamentals/top-mdr-providers15

cyberpress.org/mdr-services-to-consider12

huntress.com/cybersecurity-insights/managed-detection-response-vendors11

corporatevision-news.com/best-managed-detection-and-response-services-for-enterprises-in-210

cybersecuritynews.com/best-mdr-services10

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/mdr-solutions10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Rapid7 MDR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Rapid7 MDR; a claim can dispute any of them.

Rapid7 12Rapid7 Managed Detection & Response 1Rapid7 Managed Detection and Response 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rapid7 MDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rapid7 MDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rapid7.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.