Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
2 categories · Named, not rankedBlackpoint Cyber
24Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Blackpoint Cyber was named 3 times in Endpoint protection and 1 other category, where Microsoft Defender for Endpoint led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market24 of 86
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In endpoint protection · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Blackpoint Cyber for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint protection | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 24 of 86 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Managed detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 32 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Blackpoint Cyber held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Endpoint protection · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 22 of 83, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint protection | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 24 of 86, unchanged |
| MDR | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 32 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Blackpoint Cyber across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Blackpoint Cyber across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you do not have an internal IT security team to respond to alerts, Blackpoint Cyber is an exceptional choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · MDR · budget prompt · alternative
“such as Huntress, Red Canary, or Blackpoint Cyber” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Endpoint protection · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Blackpoint Cyber, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Blackpoint Cyber was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Blackpoint Cyber, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Blackpoint Cyber was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Blackpoint Cyber. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named Blackpoint Cyber and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
huntress.com19
reddit.com16
underdefense.com9
consilien.com7
sentinelone.com7
bellatorcyber.com6
cybersecuritynews.com6
g2.com6
guardz.com5
paloaltonetworks.com5
Eighty-six of the eighty-six domain citations in answers naming Blackpoint Cyber came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
blackpointcyber.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Blackpoint Cyber takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
blackpointcyber.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Blackpoint Cyber takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “endpoint protection platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “endpoint protection platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“blackpoint cyber”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 21 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,057 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 454 · 41 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,675
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 86 in endpoint protection
Segment leader
22%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 24 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 24 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on blackpointcyber.com
1,011
subdomains included
Content
729
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
29 · 41
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 387 | 48 | 2026-09-28 | MDR, RMM | |
| Conference or event | 76 | 5 | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 63 | 4 | 2026-09-14 | MDR, SIEM | |
| Report or ebook | 63 | 8 | 2026-09-16 | MDR, EDR | |
| Podcast or video | 46 | 0 | 2025-10-30 | MDR | |
| Case study | 40 | 1 | 2026-08-14 | MDR | |
| News or press | 40 | 2 | 2026-09-10 | MDR | |
| Comparison | 11 | 3 | 2026-08-25 | MDR, SIEM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | undated | MDR | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28How ai is reshaping cybersecurity blog
- 2026-09-23Identity threat detection gap in your security stack blog
- 2026-09-23Remotepanel and boundsiphon a dual payload toolkit for persistent access and browser theft blog
- 2026-09-22Threat pulse week of september 21 2026 blog
- 2026-09-22Redundant by design dissecting multi rat phishing campaign targeting canadian businesses blog
- 2026-09-18Historical scan msp client onboarding blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 29, 2026Join Us for Dinner in OrlandoVIVO Italian Kitchen, Orlando · hosted
- September 28, 2026 to September 30, 2026MSP Summit 2026Orlando · attended
- September 28, 2026 to September 30, 2026MSP SummitLoews Royal Pacific, Orlando · attended
- August 26, 2026 to August 28, 2026IT Nation APACHilton Sydney, Sydney · sponsored
As the event pages on blackpointcyber.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page blackpointcyber.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Blackpoint Cyber
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Blackpoint Cyber is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Blackpoint Cyber is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Managed Detection and Response Platform; “MDR THAT PERFORMS. SECURITY THAT EVOLVES.”
- For
- MSPs and MSP partners
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial blackpointcyber.com
- Customers named
- Premier OneLiberty TechnologyResponsive Technology PartnersMichael PfaffSean SextonMike Hughes
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Blackpoint Cyber's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: blackpointcyber.com, blackpointcyber.com/platform, blackpointcyber.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Blackpoint Cyber's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Blackpoint Cyber, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Blackpoint Cyber by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Blackpoint Cyber is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Blackpoint Cyber, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.