Three of fourteen models named Secure Code Warrior first on the direct prompt; two named Security Journey. Both were named by all fourteen models and Secure Code Warrior carries 51 labels and Security Journey 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the secure code training page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Secure Code Warrior and Security Journey were named in the same answer ninety-seven times, of the 153 answers naming Secure Code Warrior and the 118 naming Security Journey. In those answers Security Journey took the first choice ten times and Secure Code Warrior thirty-one.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Secure Code Warrior has the most consistent negative feedback and is the one I'd be most cautious about.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Secure Code Warrior unless your budget comfortably exceeds $50k/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Trustpilot includes recent complaints that the training feels more like testing than teaching. So I wouldn't call it a scam; I'd just recommend piloting it before buying enterprise-wide.” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“look for platforms that offer hands-on "break-fix" labs (like SecureFlag or AppSecEngineer) or highly gamified developer-first tournaments (like Secure Code Warrior)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Secure Code Warrior: Highly gamified, excellent language/framework coverage, and has rolled out extensive modules for securing AI-assisted coding.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Prioritize platforms that scale well for mid-sized enterprises (e.g., Secure Code Warrior, Security Journey, SecureFlag, Veracode Security Labs)” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Users find the learning curve steep due to lack of hands-on exercises, making the experience feel like a chore.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Security Journey is also highly regarded for its robust cybersecurity education and focus on coding challenges” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Security Journey ⭐ Best for Mid-Market” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Security Journey differentiates itself through hands-on labs providing complete application environments rather than code snippets.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.