AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › SAI360 · October 2026 Edition
4 categories · Named, not ranked

SAI360

21Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAI360 was named 9 times in Business continuity and 3 other categories, where LogicManager led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In business continuity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAI360 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Business continuity managementSecurity operations0%39 of 11420%5under 10 labels · led by LogicManager at 24%
GRC platformsSecurity operations0%57 of 7550%2under 10 labels · led by Hyperproof at 19%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Cyber risk quantificationSecurity operations0%63 of 1160%1under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25%
Third-party risk managementSecurity operations0%50 of 870%1under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 55%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAI360 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAI360 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501124
GPT-5.4 mini01102
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Need a centralized vendor-risk program across the enterprise: OneTrust, ProcessUnity, Archer, MetricStream, LogicGate, SAI360.” GPT-5.4 mini · TPRM · comparative prompt · alternative
“SAI360 is best for enterprises and mid-sized firms looking for a unified platform for GRC” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for enterprise GRC: Riskonnect, ServiceNow BCM, IBM OpenPages, SAI360” Perplexity Sonar · Business continuity · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Can be heavy for small teams with basic continuity needs, has interface complexity requiring careful configuration and training” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Business continuity · negative prompt · soft negative
“the interface feels dated and navigation can be clunky for complex tasks” Claude Haiku 4.5 · GRC · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAI360, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAI360 was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Archer12 of 210Not among the top eight
Fusion Risk Management9 of 211Not among the top eight
MetricStream7 of 211Not among the top eight
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience7 of 210Not among the top eight
Vanta5 of 211Not among the top eight
AuditBoard5 of 210Not among the top eight
MetricStream Business Continuity Management5 of 210Not among the top eight
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management4 of 211Not among the top eight
Everbridge 3604 of 210Not among the top eight
Optro4 of 210Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAI360. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named SAI360 and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

sai360.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SAI360 takes 0% of first choices and LogicManager takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “business continuity management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “business continuity management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,000 a month (“sai360”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
27 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,119 a month
Searches its site ranks for
901 · 54 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,024
Paid Google search
11 searches its ads show for, about 137 clicks and $8,800 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
67 ads · 49 text, 13 image, 5 video · 23 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2025, as SAI360 Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 53 in the year, 14 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 39 of 114 in business continuity
Segment leader
24%
LogicManager
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
21 answers
Its own site cited
in 21 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sai360.com
1,834
subdomains included
Content
1,080
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
81 · 2
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog773302026-09-28GRC, TPRM
Webinar or virtual event14392026-09-22GRC
Report or ebook10912026-07-08GRC, TPRM
Glossary or explainer1402026-05-08GRC
Case study1102024-07-23GRC
Conference or event1102026-05-26GRC
Template or tool1122026-09-25
Comparison732026-08-27
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sai360.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow SAI360

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SAI360 is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
GRC | Governance Risk and Compliance Software
For
global risk and compliance teams
Price stated
Contact for pricing sai360.com/pricing
Certifications
System Administrator Certification
Customers named
ColgatePanasonic Energy of North AmericaSIGNAL IDUNAStewart TitleKraft HeinzPrime TherapeuticsHenry ScheinNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What SAI360's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sai360.com, sai360.com/pricing, sai360.com/use-cases/compliance, sai360.com/platform-page, sai360.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAI360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAI360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAI360 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SAI360 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAI360, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sai360.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.