AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Respan · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Respan

11Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Respan was named 4 times in AI governance and 1 other category, where Credo AI led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai governance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Respan for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI governance platformsData platform2%20 of 1350%2under 10 labels · led by Credo AI at 18%
AIOps platformsIT operations and endpoint0%35 of 930%2under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Respan yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Respan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00202

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best AI governance platform for a company with a limited budget is Respan” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI governance · budget prompt · first choice
“Respan - Startup-Friendly” Kimi K2 · AIOps · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Respan, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Respan was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
LiteLLM6 of 110Not among the top eight
Portkey5 of 110Not among the top eight
Atera3 of 111Not among the top eight
Dynatrace3 of 110Not among the top eight
Elastic Observability3 of 110Not among the top eight
Arize AI2 of 112Not among the top eight
Arize Phoenix2 of 111Not among the top eight
Cloudflare AI Gateway2 of 111Not among the top eight
NetAI2 of 111Not among the top eight
New Relic2 of 111Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Respan. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Respan and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

respan.aiYour site11
g2.com4
guideflow.com4
motadata.com4
infomineo.com3
itechguides.com3
sourceforge.net3
toolradar.com3
aiopsschool.com2
atera.com2

Twenty-eight of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Respan came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on respan.ai
3,287
subdomains included
Content
724
counted in the table below
Documentation
591
Product · Integration
8 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Comparison508312026-09-29LLM gateways
Blog199262026-09-28Observability, LLM gateways
Glossary or explainer1742026-09-23LLM gateways

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page respan.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Respan

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Respan is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The AI router with built-in observability & automated evals.
For
AI agents; enterprise and healthcare teams requiring security and privacy standards; world-class founders, engineers, and product teams.
Price stated
Offers at $0; Start for free. respan.ai
Starting price
0 respan.ai
Free plan or trial
Start for free respan.ai
Integrations claimed
14 respan.ai/pricing · 1000 respan.ai/solutions/pms · 50 respan.ai/blog/integrations pages disagree
Certifications
ISO 27001SOC 2GDPRHIPAASOC 2 reportSOC II
Customers named
AlphaSenseRetell AIGumloopLovableFintaMem0Giga
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What Respan's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: respan.ai, respan.ai/pricing, trust.respan.ai, respan.ai/solutions/pms, respan.ai/blog/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Respan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Respan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Respan by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Respan is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Respan, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at respan.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.