IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Replit AI · September 2026 Edition

Replit · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Replit AI

15Judge labels

1First choices

3Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Replit AI was named 8 times in AI coding, where GitHub Copilot led with 67%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business31 of 45

under the label threshold

Mid-market8 of 46

under the label threshold

Enterprise17 of 47

under the label threshold

In ai coding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Replit AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI coding assistants	Developer platform	2%	8 of 46	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by GitHub Copilot at 67%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Replit AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Replit AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“such as GitHub Copilot (individual plan), Replit, or Gemini” Llama 4 Maverick · AI coding · budget prompt · first choice

“Best for: Full-stack app development, testing, and hosting from a browser workspace.” Mistral Small · AI coding · comparative prompt · alternative

“Cloud\u2011first, rapid prototyping | Replit Ghostwriter” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI coding · comparative prompt · alternative

“Want an all-in-one startup environment: Replit” Perplexity Sonar · AI coding · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“General Risks Across Most (e.g., Cursor, Claude Code, Replit AI)” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI coding · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Replit AI, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Replit AI was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GitHub Copilot15 of 156Not in the top three

Cursor12 of 152Not in the top three

Tabnine10 of 153Not in the top three

Windsurf9 of 150Not in the top three

Amazon Q Developer8 of 150Not in the top three

Claude Code6 of 150Not in the top three

Sourcegraph Cody4 of 150Not in the top three

Aider3 of 151Not in the top three

Cline3 of 151Not in the top three

Continue3 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Replit AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 15 answers that named Replit AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

axify.io9

learn.g2.com8

dev.to7

tech-insider.org5

zapier.com5

aionx.co4

augmentcode.com4

daily.dev4

memeburn.com4

labs.cloudsecurityalliance.org3

Fifty-three of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming Replit AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

axify.io/blog/the-best-ai-coding-assistants-a-full-comparison-of-20-tools9

learn.g2.com/best-ai-coding-assistants8

zapier.com/blog/ai-coding-tools5

aionx.co/ai-comparisons/ai-coding-assistants-compared4

daily.dev/blog/best-ai-coding-assistants-comparison4

memeburn.com/best-ai-coding-tools4

tech-insider.org/best-ai-coding-assistants-20264

replit.com/discover/best-ai-coding-assistant3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Replit AI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Replit AI; a claim can dispute any of them.

Replit 2Replit AI (Ghostwriter) 1Replit AI (formerly Ghostwriter) 1Replit Ghostwriter 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Replit AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Replit AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at replit.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.