Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 → 35 of 37
Replit · 1 category · Named, not rankedReplit AI
15Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Replit AI was named 7 times in AI coding, where GitHub Copilot led with 75%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business37 of 39
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market36 of 48
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise48 of 52
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In ai coding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Replit AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI coding assistants | Developer platform | 0% | 36 of 48 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by GitHub Copilot at 75% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Replit AI held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · AI coding · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 19 of 43
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 45 of 49
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI coding | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 36 of 48 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Replit AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Replit AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Replit Ghostwriter is best for web/learning” Mistral Small · AI coding · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Lower Priority/Avoid if Possible: ... Replit Ghostwriter: Cloud-based limits privacy ... not production” Grok 4.20 · AI coding · negative prompt · hard negative
“Cursor, Replit, Windsurf, OpenAI Codex. Named in the 43.1% unauthorized file operations taxonomy” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI coding · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Replit AI, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Replit AI was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Replit AI, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Replit AI was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Replit AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 15 answers that named Replit AI and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
dev.to7
kilo.ai7
learn.g2.com7
tech-insider.org6
tembo.io6
checkmarx.com5
intuitionlabs.ai5
layer3labs.io5
resources.rework.com5
arxiv.org4
Fifty-seven of the fifty-seven domain citations in answers naming Replit AI came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
replit.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Replit AI takes 0% of first choices and GitHub Copilot takes 75%.ShowHide
Search and answers
replit.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Replit AI takes 0% of first choices and GitHub Copilot takes 75%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ai coding assistant”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ai coding assistants”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 9,900 a month (“replit ai”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 168 a month
- Its company's site
- replit.com shared with Replit's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 251,888 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 13,218 · 1,080 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 56,981
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 50 clicks and $626 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 36 of 48 in AI coding
Segment leader
75%
GitHub Copilot
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Replit AI
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Replit AI; a claim can dispute any of them.
Replit Ghostwriter 5Replit 1
Follow Replit AI
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Replit is the company behind Replit AI.ShowHide
The company
Replit is the company behind Replit AI.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Replit
- Replit Agent
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Learn how to create comprehensive AI dashboards with Replit Agent4 from one prompt, tracking model performance, data accuracy, and ROI.
- For
- AI product managers, ML engineers and AI researchers, CTOs and engineering leaders, Finance and operations teams
- Price stated
- 0 replit.com/build/ai-dashboard
- Starting price
- 0 replit.com/build/ai-dashboard
- Free plan or trial
- Get started free replit.com/build/ai-dashboard
- Customers named
- CoinbaseDuolingoGooglePayPalStripeNotionAirbnbShopify
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Replit AI's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: replit.com/templates/ai, replit.com/build/ai-dashboard, docs.replit.com/billing/ai-billing, replit.com/usecases/ai-code-editor, replit.com/usecases/ai-app-builder. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Replit AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Replit AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Replit AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Replit AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Replit AI, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.