AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Replit Agent · October 2026 Edition
Replit · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Replit Agent

4Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Replit Agent was named 2 times in AI coding, where GitHub Copilot led with 75%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai coding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Replit Agent for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI coding assistantsDeveloper platform0%19 of 480%2under 10 labels · led by GitHub Copilot at 75%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Replit Agent held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · AI coding · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 33 → 20 of 43
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 35 → 29 of 49

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
AI coding0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 33 → 19 of 48

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Replit Agent across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Want quick app generation and deployment → Replit Agent.” Perplexity Sonar · AI coding · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Replit Agent, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Replit Agent was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
GitHub Copilot4 of 42Not among the top eight
Amazon Q Developer3 of 41Not among the top eight
Cursor3 of 40Not among the top eight
Claude Code2 of 40Not among the top eight
Gemini Code Assist2 of 40Not among the top eight
Sourcegraph Cody2 of 40Not among the top eight
Tabnine2 of 40Not among the top eight
Aider1 of 40Not among the top eight
Bolt.new1 of 40Not among the top eight
CodeSquire1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Replit Agent. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 4 answers that named Replit Agent and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bluehost.com2
learn.g2.com2
windowsforum.com2
analyticsinsight.net1
augmentcode.com1
blog.n8n.io1
builtin.com1
capterra.com1
checkmarx.com1
cloudwards.net1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Replit Agent came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

replit.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Replit Agent takes 0% of first choices and GitHub Copilot takes 75%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ai coding assistant”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ai coding assistants”
–
not in the top ten
Its company's site
replit.com shared with Replit's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 251,888 a month
Searches its site ranks for
13,218 · 1,080 in the top three
Sites linking to it
56,981
Paid Google search
3 searches its ads show for, about 50 clicks and $626 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 102 text, 16 video, 2 image · 40 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2026, as Replit, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 120 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 48 in AI coding
Segment leader
75%
GitHub Copilot
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
4 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Replit Agent

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Replit is the company behind Replit Agent.
ShowHide

On record

Company records
Also from Replit
Replit AI

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Build production-ready apps and websites with Replit Agent. Describe what you need, then let AI write, test, fix, and publish your software.
Starting price
The Economy Mode is no longer available. Power Mode replaces it at the same price. docs.replit.com/chat/agent-modes
Free plan or trial
Get started free replit.com/products/agent
Customers named
Andrew WilkinsonTinyReid HoffmanLinkedInPreston ZellerBatchDataCoinbaseDuolingo
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting

What Replit Agent's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: replit.com/products/agent, replit.com/build/agent-dashboard, docs.replit.com/chat/agent-modes, docs.replit.com/chat/agent-skills, docs.replit.com/fr/chat/agent-modes. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Replit Agent's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Replit Agent, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Replit Agent by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Replit Agent is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Replit Agent, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at replit.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.