IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Neon · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Neon

70Judge labels
11First choices
11Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in Managed databases for small business buyers
Rank 5 of 73 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 21% of its 24 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In managed databases · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Neon for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Managed relational databasesData platform6%5 of 7321%24accepted challenger
Data warehousesData platform0%32 of 41100%1under 10 labels · led by Snowflake at 47%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Neon yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Neon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash15006
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast02002
Mistral Small10012
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01102
Kimi K211013
GLM 4.7 FlashX01023
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels2
Paraphrase12 labelsNone
Comparative9 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained15 labels8
Scale-constrained6 labels1
Negative15 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative70 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For the lowest cost, Neon or Railway Postgres are the best choices.” Mistral Small · Managed databases · budget prompt · first choice
“My recommendation: Start with Neon if you just need a database” Kimi K2 · Managed databases · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for Pure PostgreSQL: Neon ... It features "Scale to Zero."” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Managed databases · budget prompt · first choice
“The Modern Postgres Platforms (Neon, Supabase, Tembo): Pros: Incredible developer experience, serverless autoscaling, database branching” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Managed databases · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Niche vendors that have recently been acquired (e.g., Neon, Tabular) if you value long-term roadmap independence.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Data warehouses · negative prompt · soft negative
“But for a mid-sized B2B company, I'd still usually choose a mainstream managed Postgres service first” GPT-5.4 mini · Managed databases · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“usually better fits for smaller teams or product-led startups than a typical B2B ops environment” Perplexity Sonar · Managed databases · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Why be cautious: While innovative, Neon's usage-based pricing can be unpredictable” Mistral Small · Managed databases · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Neon, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Neon was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Amazon RDS51 of 7013Not in the top three
Supabase51 of 705Not in the top three
Google Cloud SQL47 of 706Not in the top three
PlanetScale43 of 702Not in the top three
Azure SQL Database39 of 702Not in the top three
DigitalOcean Managed Databases29 of 707Not in the top three
Amazon Aurora23 of 705Not in the top three
Render Postgres16 of 700Not in the top three
CockroachDB13 of 700Not in the top three
Linode Managed Databases11 of 701Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Neon. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 70 answers that named Neon and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

toolradar.com27
g2.com25
estuary.dev23
tech-insider.org22
northflank.com20
auxiliar.ai17
cloudexpat.com17
worldmetrics.org15
digitalocean.com14
aws.amazon.com12

192 of the 192 domain citations in answers naming Neon came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Neon

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Neon; a claim can dispute any of them.
Neon (Serverless Postgres) 1Railway / Render / Neon 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Neon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Neon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at neon.tech is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.