| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed relational databases | Data platform | 6% | 5 of 73 | 21% | 24 | accepted challenger |
| Data warehouses | Data platform | 0% | 32 of 41 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Snowflake at 47% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For the lowest cost, Neon or Railway Postgres are the best choices.” Mistral Small · Managed databases · budget prompt · first choice
“My recommendation: Start with Neon if you just need a database” Kimi K2 · Managed databases · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for Pure PostgreSQL: Neon ... It features "Scale to Zero."” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Managed databases · budget prompt · first choice
“The Modern Postgres Platforms (Neon, Supabase, Tembo): Pros: Incredible developer experience, serverless autoscaling, database branching” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Managed databases · scale prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Niche vendors that have recently been acquired (e.g., Neon, Tabular) if you value long-term roadmap independence.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Data warehouses · negative prompt · soft negative
“But for a mid-sized B2B company, I'd still usually choose a mainstream managed Postgres service first” GPT-5.4 mini · Managed databases · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“usually better fits for smaller teams or product-led startups than a typical B2B ops environment” Perplexity Sonar · Managed databases · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Why be cautious: While innovative, Neon's usage-based pricing can be unpredictable” Mistral Small · Managed databases · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 70 answers that named Neon and are not a share of its labels.
192 of the 192 domain citations in answers naming Neon came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Neon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Neon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at neon.tech is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.