AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Querio · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Querio

5Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Querio was named 2 times in Embedded analytics, where Metabase led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In embedded analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Querio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Embedded analyticsData platform2%17 of 720%2under 10 labels · led by Metabase at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Querio yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Querio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Metabase (especially with static embeds) and Querio are the top recommendations for companies with limited budgets” Mistral Small · Embedded analytics · budget prompt · first choice
“Querio: best when I want warehouse-native analytics, inspectable SQL/Python, and file-based governance” Muse Glimmer 30B · Embedded analytics · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Querio, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Querio was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Luzmo5 of 50Not among the top eight
ThoughtSpot Embedded4 of 51Not among the top eight
Looker3 of 50Not among the top eight
Metabase3 of 50Not among the top eight
Power BI Embedded3 of 50Not among the top eight
Qrvey3 of 50Not among the top eight
Tableau Embedded Analytics3 of 50Not among the top eight
Cube2 of 50Not among the top eight
GoodData2 of 50Not among the top eight
Sisense2 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Querio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Querio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

querio.aiYour site5
draxlr.com4
peliqan.io4
upsolve.ai4
holistics.io3
usedatabrain.com3
zoho.com3
cube.dev2
knowi.com2
luzmo.com2

Twenty-seven of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming Querio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on querio.ai
961
subdomains included
Content
856
counted in the table below
Documentation
56
Product · Integration
13 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog68682026-09-24
Comparison10242026-09-24
Glossary or explainer3242026-08-31
Case study17152026-09-24
Report or ebook1792026-09-24
Template or tool202025-09-06
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page querio.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Querio

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Querio is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Querio is an AI-native analytics platform where people and AI agents query warehouse data through a reactive SQL and Python notebook, with metrics and definitions stored as files.
For
Business users
Price stated
Startup, Core, Enterprise querio.ai
Starting price
$500 per month querio.ai
Free plan or trial
Get started for free querio.ai
Integrations claimed
5 querio.ai/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2 Type II complianceSOC2HIPAAITAR complianceSOC 2 Type IISOC 2GDPR
Customers named
OpenVPNGrowdashAgree.comPassportTotal Primary CarePhysicians ChoiceAnthropicOpenAI
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What Querio's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: querio.ai, querio.ai/pricing, trust.querio.ai, querio.ai/solutions/team/data, querio.ai/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Querio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Querio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Querio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Querio is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Querio, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at querio.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.