| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise browsers | Security operations | 14% | 3 of 80 | 3% | 33 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Chrome Enterprise and Edge for Business are strong choices if you want to keep the familiar Chromium experience and add management and DLP.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Enterprise browsers · comparative prompt · first choice
“Chrome Enterprise and Microsoft Edge for Business are cited as leading the competitive landscape in the enterprise browser market” Muse Glimmer 30B · Enterprise browsers · comparative prompt · first choice
“Microsoft Edge for Business is inbox with Windows and requires no separate browser license. It's the lowest operational cost path” Muse Glimmer 30B · Enterprise browsers · budget prompt · first choice
“Microsoft shop with M365 E5 → Edge for Business is effectively free and integrates perfectly with Entra ID. Start there.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Enterprise browsers · scale prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“they often need extra tooling for last-mile DLP, isolation, and deeper session controls” Perplexity Sonar · Enterprise browsers · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 113 of the 114 answers that named Microsoft Edge for Business and are not a share of its labels.
480 of the 480 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Edge for Business came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Edge for Business's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Edge for Business, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Edge for Business by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Microsoft Edge for Business is among the products AI models recommend first in Enterprise browsers this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.