| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business password managers | Identity and access | 0% | 33 of 35 | 100% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Bitwarden at 49% |
| Multi-factor authentication | Identity and access | 0% | 38 of 78 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Cisco Duo at 42% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“(e.g., Apple Keychain, Windows Hello, Google Password Manager)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · MFA · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Browser-built-in password managers such as Google Chrome / Google Account storage ... are poor fits for companies” Perplexity Sonar · Password managers · negative prompt · hard negative
“Google Chrome Password Manager / Browser-Based Managers — Avoid for Business” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Password managers · negative prompt · hard negative
“consumer-grade password managers such as Chrome, Google Account storage, and Apple Keychain lack corporate-level security and visibility” Llama 4 Maverick · Password managers · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 12 answers that named Google Password Manager and are not a share of its labels.
Fifty-two of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Google Password Manager came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Password Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Password Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.dev is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.