Every category where a model named Bizagi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Process mining	IT operations and endpoint	0%	21 of 61	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19%
Workflow orchestration	Data platform	0%	47 of 79	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Prefect at 21%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bizagi yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bizagi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	2
Grok 4.20	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	2	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Consider Bizagi or a free trial of UiPath Process Mining.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Process mining · budget prompt · alternative

“G2 notes Bizagi is among the most affordable options for SMBs” Perplexity Sonar · Process mining · budget prompt · alternative

“Bizagi | Low-code BPM + mining | Custom | 4.4/5” Grok 4.20 · Process mining · scale prompt · alternative

“Best for Cost-Conscious Modeling + Mining” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Process mining · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bizagi, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bizagi was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Power Automate13 of 227Not among the top eight

Celonis Process Intelligence Platform12 of 221Not among the top eight

ProcessMind10 of 223Not among the top eight

UiPath Process Mining10 of 221Not among the top eight

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence9 of 220Not among the top eight

Apromore6 of 221Not among the top eight

IBM Process Mining6 of 220Not among the top eight

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining5 of 223Not among the top eight

Apromore Community Edition4 of 221Not among the top eight

ProM3 of 221Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bizagi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Bizagi and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com19

bardeen.ai16

g2.com13

processmind.com12

us.fitgap.com10

process.st9

thectoclub.com9

itechguides.com8

omr.com8

scribe.com8

112 of the 112 domain citations in answers naming Bizagi came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-process-mining-software19

bardeen.ai/best/process-intelligence-software12

bardeen.ai/best/process-mining-tools12

process.st/process-mining8

processmind.com/resources/blog/the-best-process-mining-tools-of-20268

softwaresuggest.com/process-mining-tools8

thectoclub.com/tools/best-process-mining-software8

g2.com/categories/process-mining-tools/small-business7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

bizagi.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Bizagi takes 0% of first choices and Apromore takes 19%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “process mining tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “process mining tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,000 a month (“bizagi”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 23 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,832 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 625 · 45 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,879
Paid Google search: 4 searches its ads show for, about 18 clicks and $1,127 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

14 ads · 11 text, 3 video · 7 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2023, as Bizagi Limited, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 11 in the year, 3 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 21 of 61 in process mining

Segment leader

19%

Apromore

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 22 answers
Its own site cited: in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on bizagi.com

2,628

subdomains included

Content

582

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

73 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	409	5	2026-09-07	Compliance automation
News or press	66	0	2025-11-26
Webinar or virtual event	38	3	2026-08-12
Conference or event	22	0	2026-03-11
Comparison	15	1	2026-08-11
Glossary or explainer	15	0	2026-02-13
Case study	11	undated
Template or tool	6	0	2024-08-29

Most recent

2026-09-07Bpo automation business process outsourcing blog
2026-09-02Ai for bpo blog
2026-08-12Bizagi summer 2026 focus ai where it matters BNJLkypm9x46aBc webinar or virtual event
2026-08-11Orchestration vs automation comparison
2026-07-28Case management explained blog
2026-07-17Top 4 ai agent use cases from theory to action 0uAl831Bz2BJ6lb webinar or virtual event

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page bizagi.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Bizagi

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Bizagi is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Business Orchestration for AI Impact
bizagi.com
For: enterprise customers
bizagi.com
Price stated: consumption-based pricing model with unlimited users and apps bizagi.com
Integrations claimed: 30 bizagi.com/en/customers
Certifications: Microsoft Certification for Manufacturing AIMicrosoft recognizes Bizagi as a Financial Services AI Certified Software.Bizagi Certification Program
Customers named: DHL GroupUnilever InternationalOld MutualBNP Paribas Cardif JapanManpowerGroupCBCBunzl Retail SuppliesInsight Investment
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What Bizagi's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: bizagi.com, bizagi.com/en/platform/trust, bizagi.com/en/platform/trust, bizagi.com/en/customers, bizagi.com/en/resources/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bizagi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bizagi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bizagi by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Bizagi is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bizagi, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.