Index › Products › PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise

8Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise was named 2 times in DAST, where OWASP ZAP led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business35 of 53

under the label threshold

Mid-market26 of 58

under the label threshold

Enterprise18 of 54

under the label threshold

In dast · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Dynamic application security testing	Developer platform	0%	26 of 58	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by OWASP ZAP at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 label1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Burp Suite Pro is the industry standard for penetration testers” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DAST · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Veracode DAST7 of 81Not among the top eight

Acunetix5 of 82Not among the top eight

Checkmarx One4 of 81Not among the top eight

Invicti4 of 81Not among the top eight

Rapid7 InsightAppSec4 of 80Not among the top eight

OWASP ZAP3 of 81Not among the top eight

AppCheck2 of 80Not among the top eight

Bright Security2 of 80Not among the top eight

Contrast Security2 of 80Not among the top eight

HCL AppScan2 of 80Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 8 answers that named PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getastra.com4

aimultiple.com3

cyberpress.org3

softwaretestinghelp.com3

acunetix.com2

aikido.dev2

augmentcode.com2

beaglesecurity.com2

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com2

expertinsights.com2

No domain is on file for PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

getastra.com/blog/dast/tools4

aimultiple.com/dast-tools3

cyberpress.org/dast-tools-by-use-case3

softwaretestinghelp.com/dynamic-application-security-testing-dast-software3

acunetix.com/blog/web-security-zone/10-best-dast-tools2

aikido.dev/blog/top-dynamic-application-security-testing-dast-tools2

augmentcode.com/tools/best-dast-tools-for-enterprise-security2

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/tools/best-dast-tools/1247568822

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise; a claim can dispute any of them.

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional 1

Follow PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.