Four of fourteen models named NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management first on the direct prompt; zero named Patch My PC. NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Patch My PC by nine and NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management carries 37 labels and Patch My PC 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the patch management page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management and Patch My PC were named in the same answer twenty-nine times, of the 121 answers naming NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management and the 51 naming Patch My PC. In those answers Patch My PC took the first choice four times and NinjaOne Autonomous Patch Management seven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“only if you are also paying for broader RMM/IT management features, since their pricing model is aimed more at bundled platform use” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“reviews highlight frequent patch failures without clear root-cause diagnostics, limited Mac/Linux support” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“NinjaOne (though NinjaOne is pricier, it is highly rated)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Prioritize tools with strong mid-market fit (e.g., Automox for cloud simplicity, NinjaOne for RMM integration).” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose NinjaOne or Automox if you want strong automation and simpler cloud-managed patching.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“are often the safest all-round choices because they combine broad third-party coverage” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Patch My PC connects directly to your Intune tenant and automatically populates it with a catalog of over 3,500 pre-packaged, pre-tested third-party applications” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you're already on Microsoft 365 → Intune + Patch My PC - Most cost-effective - Largest third-party catalog” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Patch management: Patch My PC + Microsoft Intune/ConfigMgr for app patching and endpoint control” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.