Every category where a model named Docsumo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Intelligent document processing	Data platform	6%	4 of 89	4%	23	accepted challenger
Identity verification	Identity and access	0%	30 of 61	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Persona at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Docsumo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Docsumo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	2	0	4
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	2	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labels6

Paraphrase14 labels6

Comparative18 labels6not counted in share

Budget-constrained14 labels2

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative5 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative74 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 21 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Parseur (free plan → $39/month Pro) or Docsumo (14-day free trial → $299/month Business) are the best starting points.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Document processing · budget prompt · first choice

“For most mid-market B2B companies, Nanonets or Docsumo offer the best balance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Document processing · direct prompt · first choice

“Start with Nanonets or Docsumo if you want fast time-to-value and manageable costs” Kimi K2 · Document processing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“If you need specialized processing for financial documents, Docsumo or ABBYY Vantage may be more suitable.” MiniMax M2.5 · Document processing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Worth testing, but get a quote before committing: Docsumo. ... production pricing is custom and setup fees may apply.” GPT-6 Luna · Document processing · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Docsumo, over the 74 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Docsumo was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Nanonets49 of 7413Compare →

Rossum44 of 743Compare →

ABBYY Vantage37 of 745Compare →

UiPath Document Understanding33 of 740Compare →

Amazon Textract31 of 741Compare →

Google Document AI27 of 741Compare →

Parseur23 of 749Not among the top eight

Hyperscience Hypercell23 of 742Not among the top eight

Docparser16 of 742Not among the top eight

Azure AI Document Intelligence16 of 740Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Docsumo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 73 of the 74 answers that named Docsumo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

docsumo.comYour site57

g2.com42

llamaindex.ai35

klippa.com34

larksuite.com34

nanonets.com27

parseur.com27

flowwright.com26

lido.app21

raftlabs.com21

267 of the 324 domain citations in answers naming Docsumo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

docsumo.com/blog/the-best-intelligent-document-processing-software44

larksuite.com/en_us/blog/intelligent-document-processing-software34

klippa.com/en/blog/information/idp-software33

llamaindex.ai/insights/best-idp-tools32

g2.com/categories/intelligent-document-processing-idp/small-business28

flowwright.com/blog/8-best-intelligent-document-processing-software22

raftlabs.com/blog/top-intelligent-document-processing-companies21

nanonets.com/buyers-guide/best-intelligent-document-processing-software18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

docsumo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Docsumo takes 6% of first choices and Nanonets takes 32%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “intelligent document processing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “intelligent document processing platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 590 a month (“docsumo”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 12,362 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,121 · 125 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,137
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

11 ads · 5 image, 3 text, 3 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2024, as Docsumo Pte Ltd, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 4 of 89 in document processing

Segment leader

32%

Nanonets

First choices: 14 across its categories
Named in: 74 answers
Its own site cited: in 73 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on docsumo.com

565

subdomains included

Content

255

counted in the table below

Documentation

263

Product · Integration

27 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	183	9	2026-09-28
Comparison	38	25	2026-09-25
Glossary or explainer	19	1	2026-09-26
Case study	15	15	2026-09-26

Most recent

2026-09-28Loss run data extraction blog
2026-09-28Best healthcare data extraction software blog
2026-09-27Workflow automation statistics blog
2026-09-27Unstructured data statistics blog
2026-09-27Cost of bad data statistics blog
2026-09-27Ai in finance statistics blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page docsumo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Docsumo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Docsumo is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Document AI Layer for Enterprise Workflows
docsumo.com
For: Enterprise teams in lending, debt settlement, insurance, healthcare eligibility and accounts payable
docsumo.com
Price stated: Free plan for 14 days; Business and Enterprise plans are priced on the volume you process, with up to 10% off annual subscriptions. docsumo.com
Starting price: 0 docsumo.com
Free plan or trial: 1,000 pages free for 14 days docsumo.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type 2HIPAAGDPRISO 27001ISO/IEC 27001:2022
Hosting: US (N. Virginia)US (Ohio)EU (Frankfurt)UK (London)India (Mumbai)Australia (Sydney)Singapore
Customers named: Grid FinanceHitachiPayUNational Debt ReliefClearOne AdvantageArborValtatechVertikal RMS
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations

What Docsumo's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: docsumo.com, docsumo.com/pricing, docsumo.com/security, docsumo.com/platform, docsumo.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Docsumo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Docsumo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Docsumo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Docsumo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Docsumo, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.