Every category where a model named Klippa DocHorizon for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Intelligent document processing	Data platform	2%	14 of 89	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Nanonets at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Klippa DocHorizon yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Klippa DocHorizon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Klippa is the safest default recommendation” Perplexity Sonar · Document processing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“### 3. Klippa - Best for: SMBs and mid-sized businesses” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Document processing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“best for European GDPR-forward, fraud-aware processing” Muse Glimmer 30B · Document processing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Users report difficulties in tracking the precision of data extraction features and limited analytics capabilities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Document processing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Klippa DocHorizon, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Klippa DocHorizon was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Docsumo10 of 142Not among the top eight

Rossum10 of 142Not among the top eight

Nanonets9 of 144Not among the top eight

UiPath Document Understanding7 of 140Not among the top eight

Parseur5 of 142Not among the top eight

ABBYY Vantage5 of 140Not among the top eight

Hyperscience Hypercell4 of 140Not among the top eight

Amazon Textract3 of 140Not among the top eight

Google Document AI3 of 140Not among the top eight

Lido2 of 142Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Klippa DocHorizon. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 14 answers that named Klippa DocHorizon and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

docsumo.com12

klippa.comYour site9

larksuite.com9

g2.com7

nanonets.com7

flowwright.com6

gartner.com6

parseur.com6

llamaindex.ai5

procys.com5

Sixty-three of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Klippa DocHorizon came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

docsumo.com/blog/the-best-intelligent-document-processing-software10

klippa.com/en/blog/information/idp-software9

larksuite.com/en_us/blog/intelligent-document-processing-software9

gartner.com/reviews/market/intelligent-document-processing-solutions6

nanonets.com/buyers-guide/best-intelligent-document-processing-software6

flowwright.com/blog/8-best-intelligent-document-processing-software5

g2.com/categories/intelligent-document-processing-idp/small-business5

llamaindex.ai/insights/best-idp-tools5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

klippa.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Klippa DocHorizon takes 2% of first choices and Nanonets takes 32%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “intelligent document processing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “intelligent document processing platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 70 a month (“klippa dochorizon”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 32,854 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 4,085 · 46 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,447
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

3 ads · 3 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2022, as Klippa App B.V., verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 14 of 89 in document processing

Segment leader

32%

Nanonets

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 14 answers
Its own site cited: in 13 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on klippa.com

3,318

subdomains included

Content

703

counted in the table below

Documentation

198

Product · Integration

42 · 51

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	496	2	2026-07-27
Comparison	59	0	2026-06-15
Case study	41	undated
Podcast or video	38	0	2025-03-13
News or press	27	undated
Glossary or explainer	22	0	2026-03-04
Webinar or virtual event	8	undated
Report or ebook	8	undated
Template or tool	4	0	2026-01-14

Most recent

2026-07-27Debit and credit card scanning blog
2026-07-24Document sorting with ai blog
2026-06-15Alternatives to abbyy comparison
2026-05-11Pdf e facturen peppol blog
2026-05-06Scan herken software blog
2026-05-05Digitaal boekhouden blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page klippa.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Klippa DocHorizon

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Klippa DocHorizon; a claim can dispute any of them.

Klippa 2Klippa DocHorizon / Doxis AI.dp 1

Follow Klippa DocHorizon

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Klippa DocHorizon is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI oplossingen voor geautomatiseerde documentverwerking
klippa.com
For: bedrijven
klippa.com
Free plan or trial: probeer deze gratis uit klippa.com
Certifications: ISO 27001 gecertificeerdCompliant met de AVG, SOC & SOC 2 en CCPAISO 27001 & ISAE 3000 Type II CertifiedGDPR compliantISO & GDPR Compliant Provider
Hosting: Microsoft Azure in een regio naar keuzeEUUSSwitzerlandEuropeOver 150 countries supported
Customers named: Label AHotelinkingAlascoTRIPUZASolvinityCROPPennylane
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations

What Klippa DocHorizon's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: klippa.com, klippa.com/en/expense-management/pricing, klippa.com/en/compliance, klippa.com/en/use-cases, klippa.com/en/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Klippa DocHorizon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Klippa DocHorizon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Klippa DocHorizon by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Klippa DocHorizon is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Klippa DocHorizon, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.