| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extended detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 26 of 58 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender XDR at 40% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Network detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 37 of 102 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer at 21% | |
| Threat intelligence platforms | Security operations | 0% | 114 of 119 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by MISP at 12% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Data security posture management | Security operations | 0% | 53 of 105 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview at 18% | |
| DNS filtering | Network and edge | 0% | 60 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by DNSFilter at 59% | |
| Web application firewalls | Network and edge | 0% | 60 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare WAF at 69% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XDR | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 50 → 26 of 58 |
| NDR | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 37 of 102, unchanged |
| Threat intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 114 of 119, unchanged |
| DNS filtering | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 60 of 94, unchanged |
| WAF | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 60 of 82, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Palo Alto firewalls + want SOC | Palo Alto Cortex XDR + Unit 42 MDR” Kimi K2 · XDR · scale prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"CrowdStrike, Microsoft and Palo Alto bundle threat intelligence into endpoint licenses you may already pay for."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Threat intel · negative prompt · soft negative
“CrowdStrike, Microsoft, and Palo Alto bundle threat intelligence into endpoint licenses” Kimi K2 · Threat intel · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 28 answers that named Palo Alto and are not a share of its labels.
Fifty-four of the sixty-two domain citations in answers naming Palo Alto came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 3,467 | 39 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1,861 | 0 | 2011-10-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 535 | 0 | 2015-08-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 430 | 0 | 2022-07-04 | ||
| News or press | 408 | 0 | 2018-12-01 | ||
| Case study | 351 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 104 | 0 | 2019-08-08 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 87 | 0 | 2018-07-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 87 | 0 | 2018-04-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 21 | undated |
Every page paloaltonetworks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Palo Alto's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: paloaltonetworks.com, trust.paloaltonetworks.com, paloaltonetworks.com/products/products-a-z, paloaltonetworks.com/customers, paloaltonetworks.com/blog/tag/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Palo Alto's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Palo Alto, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Palo Alto by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: