IT AI Index
Index › Vendors › Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud · September 2026 Edition
Palo Alto · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud

3Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
3 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud was named 1 time in CNAPP, where Wiz led with 46%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market33 of 57
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise22 of 35
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In cnapp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Cloud-native application protectionCloud and infrastructure0%33 of 570%1under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 46%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Prisma Cloud if you need the deepest feature set and have resources to manage complexity” Kimi K2 · CNAPP · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Orca Security3 of 32Not in the top three
Wiz3 of 32Not in the top three
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security3 of 30Not in the top three
Microsoft Defender for Cloud3 of 30Not in the top three
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security2 of 30Not in the top three
Sysdig Secure2 of 30Not in the top three
AWS Security Hub1 of 30Not in the top three
Aqua Security1 of 30Not in the top three
Check Point CloudGuard1 of 30Not in the top three
Google Security Command Center1 of 30Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudaware.com3
cyberpress.org3
cybersecuritynews.com3
gbhackers.com3
aikido.dev2
crowdstrike.com2
expertinsights.com2
orca.security2
wiz.io2
accuknox.com1

Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cloudaware.com/blog/cnapp-tools2
cyberpress.org/cnapp-platforms-by-business-size-22
expertinsights.com/application-security/the-top-cloud-native-application-protection-platfo2
gbhackers.com/best-cnapp-compared2
accuknox.com/blog/best-cnapp-tools-for-enterprise-security1
aikido.dev/blog/top-cloud-native-application-protection-platforms-cnapp1
aikido.dev/blog/top-cloud-security-posture-management-cspm-tools1
appsecsanta.com/application-security/cspm-vs-cnapp1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at palo.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack