AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › OWASP Juice Shop · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

OWASP Juice Shop

5Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. OWASP Juice Shop was named 2 times in API security and 1 other category, where Aikido Security led with 12%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In api security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named OWASP Juice Shop for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
API security platformsSecurity operations0%51 of 930%1under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 12%
Secure code trainingDeveloper platform0%49 of 970%1under 10 labels · led by SecureFlag at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OWASP Juice Shop yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OWASP Juice Shop across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“free, intentionally vulnerable applications built specifically for practicing exploitation of Top 10-style bugs” Muse Glimmer 30B · Secure code training · budget prompt · alternative
“OWASP Juice Shop is the best "guinea pig" application” GLM 4.7 FlashX · API security · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OWASP Juice Shop, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OWASP Juice Shop was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
PortSwigger Web Security Academy3 of 51Not among the top eight
Hacksplaining2 of 50Not among the top eight
Secure Code Warrior2 of 50Not among the top eight
Snyk Learn2 of 50Not among the top eight
Postman1 of 51Not among the top eight
SecureFlag1 of 51Not among the top eight
The Linux Foundation & OpenSSF: LFD1211 of 51Not among the top eight
Codebashing1 of 50Not among the top eight
DVWA1 of 50Not among the top eight
G2 Community Mode / free picked labs1 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OWASP Juice Shop. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named OWASP Juice Shop and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

github.com4
sourceforge.net3
top10devtraining.com3
f6s.com2
g2.com2
openssf.org2
portswigger.net2
ransomleak.com2
safeguard.sh2
topbusinesssoftware.com2

Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming OWASP Juice Shop came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

owasp.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, OWASP Juice Shop takes 0% of first choices and Aikido Security takes 12%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “api security platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “api security platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 365,222 a month
Searches its site ranks for
104,405 · 3,003 in the top three
Sites linking to it
65,251
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 51 of 93 in API security
Segment leader
12%
Aikido Security
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
5 answers
Its own site cited
in 5 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on owasp.org
893
subdomains included
Content
154
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
30 · 216
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog8602025-08-05
Conference or event3502025-11-14
News or press1802024-11-20
Webinar or virtual event702026-05-13
Podcast or video4undated
Template or tool302024-05-08
Glossary or explainer1undated

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on owasp.org state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page owasp.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow OWASP Juice Shop

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

OWASP Juice Shop is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
A globally-used, intentionally insecure web app for security training.
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What OWASP Juice Shop's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: owasp.org, owasp.org/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OWASP Juice Shop's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OWASP Juice Shop, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OWASP Juice Shop by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where OWASP Juice Shop is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name OWASP Juice Shop, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at owasp.org is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.