AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Hacksplaining · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Hacksplaining

9Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Hacksplaining was named 3 times in Secure code training, where SecureFlag led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In secure code training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Hacksplaining for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Secure code trainingDeveloper platform0%28 of 970%3under 10 labels · led by SecureFlag at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Hacksplaining yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Hacksplaining across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Hacksplaining if your developers are beginners to AppSec and need very short, visual, easy-to-understand lessons.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secure code training · budget prompt · alternative
“Strong Free Alternative: Hacksplaining (Free Catalog)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Secure code training · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Hacksplaining, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hacksplaining was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Secure Code Warrior7 of 90Not among the top eight
SecureFlag5 of 92Not among the top eight
Snyk Learn5 of 91Not among the top eight
PortSwigger Web Security Academy4 of 91Not among the top eight
SafeStack Academy4 of 91Not among the top eight
OWASP Secure Coding Dojo2 of 91Not among the top eight
OWASP resources2 of 91Not among the top eight
Checkmarx Codebashing2 of 90Not among the top eight
Codebashing2 of 90Not among the top eight
Kontra2 of 90Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hacksplaining. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Hacksplaining and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sourceforge.net7
slashdot.org6
top10devtraining.com6
cybersectools.com5
ransomleak.com5
marketintelo.com4
us.fitgap.com4
blog.secureflag.com3
hacksplaining.comYour site3
securecodewarrior.com3

Forty-three of the forty-six domain citations in answers naming Hacksplaining came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on hacksplaining.com
132
subdomains included
Content
33
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer33undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page hacksplaining.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Hacksplaining

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Hacksplaining is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Free interactive secure code lessons covering the OWASP Top 10 and emerging LLM vulnerabilities.
For
software teams
Price stated
Free for personal use. Team features like dashboards, progress tracking, and compliance reports are paid. hacksplaining.com
Free plan or trial
Free for personal use; Free 14-day trial hacksplaining.com
Customers named
GoogleIBMMicrosoftWalmartIntelAmazonOracleGeneral Motors
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Hacksplaining's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: hacksplaining.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hacksplaining's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hacksplaining, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Hacksplaining by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Hacksplaining is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Hacksplaining, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hacksplaining.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.