Every category where a model named Oracle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Communications archiving and compliance	Security operations	0%	53 of 101	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Smarsh Enterprise Archive at 20%
Data masking and test data management	Data platform	0%	121 of 140	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by DATPROF at 17%
Enterprise architecture tools	IT operations and endpoint	0%	108 of 113	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25%
IT financial management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	138 of 159	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Nicus ITFM Platform at 9%
Non-human identity management	Identity and access	0%	111 of 128	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14%
Master data management	Data platform	0%	30 of 92	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Profisee MDM at 41%
Vector databases	Data platform	0%	40 of 44	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by pgvector at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	3	4
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	3	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative18 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Known for its product-centric MDM (e.g., Oracle Product Hub)” Mistral Small · Master data · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Many major database engines (e.g., SQL Server, Oracle, Snowflake) offer native, built-in Dynamic Data Masking (DDM) out of the box. While convenient, relying on these as your primary defense is highly risky.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data masking · negative prompt · soft negative

“You generally want to avoid the massive overhead of enterprise tools (like Oracle or custom implementations)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · EA tools · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“You likely do not need the heavy-handed, million-dollar infrastructure of IBM or Oracle” Qwen 3.7 Flash · EA tools · direct prompt · soft negative

“Implementation complexity and infrastructure requirements can be significant” Claude Haiku 4.5 · NHI management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

IBM10 of 480Not among the top eight

SAP8 of 480Not among the top eight

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud6 of 481Not among the top eight

PostgreSQL6 of 481Not among the top eight

IRI FieldShield5 of 484Not among the top eight

ServiceNow IT Financial Management5 of 484Not among the top eight

Apache Cassandra5 of 480Not among the top eight

Microsoft5 of 480Not among the top eight

MySQL5 of 480Not among the top eight

TimescaleDB4 of 484Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 44 of the 48 answers that named Oracle and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com15

gartner.com12

guideflow.com7

ovaledge.com7

peerspot.com7

worldmetrics.org7

aws.amazon.com6

dataintelo.com6

sourceforge.net6

alibaba.com5

Seventy-eight of the seventy-eight domain citations in answers naming Oracle came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

alibaba.com/product-insights/time-series-data-storage.html5

gartner.com/reviews/market/it-financial-management-tools5

hevodata.com/learn/data-masking-tools5

ovaledge.com/blog/data-masking-tools5

questdb.com/blog/best-time-series-databases5

softwaretestinghelp.com/data-masking-tools5

tigerdata.com/learn/the-best-time-series-databases-compared5

dataintelo.com/report/it-financial-management-software-market4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

oracle.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Oracle takes 0% of first choices and Smarsh Enterprise Archive takes 20%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “communications archiving platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “communications archiving platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 450,000 a month (“oracle”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 66,611 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 7,410,638 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 280,257 · 54,144 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 265,940
Paid Google search: 9 searches its ads show for, about 43 clicks and $247 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

101+ ads · 101 text · 101 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2023, as Oracle America, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 37 in the year, 64 before. 19 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 53 of 101 in comms archiving

Segment leader

20%

Smarsh Enterprise Archive

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 48 answers
Its own site cited: in 44 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on oracle.com

10,005

subdomains included

Content

481

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

2 · 1

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days
Glossary or explainer	220	undated
Conference or event	171	undated
Case study	37	undated
Template or tool	14	undated
Webinar or virtual event	13	undated
Report or ebook	13	undated
Blog	11	undated
Comparison	2	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page oracle.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Oracle

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Oracle is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Oracle Trust Center: Our mission is securing your data
oracle.com/trust
For: organizations
oracle.com/trust
Price stated: Save $500 per person with special group pricing. oracle.com/ai-world/partners
Free plan or trial: Try Oracle Cloud Free Tier oracle.com/corporate/features/connect-analyze-integrate.html
Certifications: Common Criteria evaluation
Customers named: Liberty EnergyKobalt MusicNHS Shared Business ServicesWorldlineRappiAVConduentRenesas
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, hosting

What Oracle's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: oracle.com, oracle.com/trust, oracle.com/corporate/features/connect-analyze-integrate.html, oracle.com/customers, oracle.com/ai-world/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Oracle is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.