IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Oomnitza · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Oomnitza

13Judge labels

2First choices

1Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oomnitza was named 6 times in ITAM, where Snipe-IT led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business45 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market17 of 61

under the label threshold

Enterprise5 of 83

under the label threshold

In itam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oomnitza for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
IT asset management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	17 of 61	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Snipe-IT at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oomnitza yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oomnitza across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained6 labels2

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Very powerful automation capabilities, bridging enterprise ITAM and mid-market agility.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · scale prompt · alternative

“Mid-market modern ITAM | Automated lifecycle tracking with strong integrations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ITAM · scale prompt · alternative

“SaaS‑heavy or license optimization focus – Oomnitza, Torii, Zluri.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ITAM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oomnitza, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oomnitza was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ServiceNow IT Asset Management10 of 130Not in the top three

Freshservice8 of 131Not in the top three

Snipe-IT8 of 130Not in the top three

Asset Panda7 of 130Not in the top three

Flexera One7 of 130Not in the top three

Lansweeper7 of 130Not in the top three

ManageEngine AssetExplorer5 of 132Not in the top three

Ivanti Neurons for ITAM5 of 130Not in the top three

Device424 of 130Not in the top three

InvGate Asset Management4 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oomnitza. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 13 answers that named Oomnitza and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.invgate.com6

cloudaware.com5

virima.com5

assetmanagement.global4

assetpanda.com4

ezo.io4

flexera.com4

setyl.com4

g2.com3

goworkwize.com3

Forty-two of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming Oomnitza came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blog.invgate.com/it-asset-management-software5

cloudaware.com/blog/asset-management-tools5

assetmanagement.global/blog/it-asset-management/best-it-asset-management-software4

assetpanda.com/resource-center/compare/best-it-asset-management-software-top-itam-platform4

virima.com/blog/top-asset-management-tools-you-need-to-know-about4

flexera.com/products/compare/flexera-vs-lansweeper3

guideflow.com/blog/it-asset-management-software3

olive.app/blog/top-itam-software-rankings-20263

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oomnitza's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oomnitza, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oomnitza.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.