Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 → 44 of 59
3 categories · Named, not rankedOneUptime
15Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. OneUptime was named 4 times in Incidents and 2 other categories, where incident.io led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business47 of 63
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market23 of 65
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise16 of 44
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In incidents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named OneUptime for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incident management and on-call | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 23 of 65 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by incident.io at 32% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data quality and observability | Data platform | 0% | 83 of 110 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31% | |
| Website and synthetic monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 51 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by UptimeRobot at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, OneUptime held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Incidents · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 11 → 21 of 57
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 of 39, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incidents | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 23 of 65 |
| Data observability | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 83 of 110, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated OneUptime across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated OneUptime across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“An all-in-one open-source observability and incident platform. You can self-host the entire system for free.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Incidents · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OneUptime, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OneUptime was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OneUptime, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OneUptime was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OneUptime. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named OneUptime and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
oneuptime.comYour site10
rootly.com6
augmentcode.com5
betterstack.com5
g2.com4
runframe.io4
uptimerobot.com4
us.fitgap.com4
fluidify.ai3
github.com3
Thirty-eight of the forty-eight domain citations in answers naming OneUptime came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
oneuptime.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, OneUptime takes 0% of first choices and incident.io takes 32%.ShowHide
Search and answers
oneuptime.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, OneUptime takes 0% of first choices and incident.io takes 32%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “incident management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “incident management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 65 in incidents
Segment leader
32%
incident.io
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on oneuptime.com
17,167
subdomains included
Content
17,033
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
74 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 16,587 | 99 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 405 | 91 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 33 | 10 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 4 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 0 | 2026-03-31 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2026-03-31 |
Most recent
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page oneuptime.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow OneUptime
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
OneUptime is its own company.ShowHide
The company
OneUptime is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Open-Source Observability & Incident Management
- For
- engineering teams
- Price stated
- $1 per active monitor per month; SMS from $0.10; $20 per 1M tokens oneuptime.com
- Starting price
- $1 per active monitor per month oneuptime.com
- Free plan or trial
- Get started free; No credit card required; Free forever plan; Self-host anytime oneuptime.com
- Integrations claimed
- 5000 oneuptime.com
- Certifications
- ISO 270012701727018SOC 2HIPAAGDPRSOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001
- Hosting
- USEUyour own datacenterUS-EastUS-WestEU-WestEU-CentralAP-Southeast
- Customers named
- Cloudwave TechnologiesDataStream AnalyticsQuantum Computing CoRetailBoxSaaS MetricsAI DynamicsCryptoVault ExchangePayFlow Systems
What OneUptime's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: oneuptime.com, oneuptime.com/pricing, oneuptime.com/trust, oneuptime.com/product/iot. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OneUptime's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OneUptime, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OneUptime by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where OneUptime is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name OneUptime, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.