Every category where a model named Netwrix Privilege Secure for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Privileged access management	Identity and access	0%	14 of 74	0%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Netwrix Privilege Secure yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Netwrix Privilege Secure across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	2
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“if your environment is Microsoft-Centric, Netwrix Privilege Secure is also an excellent, specialized choice” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for Microsoft-Centric Environments: Netwrix Privilege Secure ... Netwrix is a strong contender.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“is a strong alternative for mid-market regulated organizations with hybrid environments” Perplexity Sonar · PAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Identity-centric approach, low switching friction, built for 100–5,000 employee orgs” Kimi K2 · PAM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Netwrix Privilege Secure, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Netwrix Privilege Secure was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ManageEngine PAM36012 of 135Not in the top three

Delinea9 of 133Not in the top three

CyberArk9 of 131Not in the top three

Securden Unified PAM7 of 134Not in the top three

BeyondTrust7 of 130Not in the top three

miniOrange PAM6 of 131Not in the top three

Delinea Secret Server1 of 131Not in the top three

JumpCloud1 of 130Not in the top three

KeeperPAM1 of 130Not in the top three

One Identity Safeguard1 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Netwrix Privilege Secure. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Netwrix Privilege Secure and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

netwrix.comYour site13

oneidentity.com10

aimultiple.com9

mitigata.com9

startwithidentity.com8

ecommercefastlane.com7

cybervendorguide.com5

expertinsights.com5

decryptiondigest.com4

learn.g2.com4

Sixty-one of the seventy-four domain citations in answers naming Netwrix Privilege Secure came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

netwrix.com/en/resources/blog/pam-solutions13

oneidentity.com/learn/top-5-privileged-access-management-tools-in-2025.aspx10

aimultiple.com/pam-solutions9

mitigata.com/blog/best-pam-tools9

ecommercefastlane.com/best-privileged-access-management-platform7

cybervendorguide.com/guides/privileged-access-management5

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/the-top-privileged-access-management-pam5

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-pam-tools5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Netwrix Privilege Secure's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Netwrix Privilege Secure, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at netwrix.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.