AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Mimecast · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Mimecast

5Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mimecast was named 2 times in Client-side protection and 1 other category, where cside led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In client-side protection · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mimecast for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Client-side protectionSecurity operations0%94 of 1200%1under 10 labels · led by cside at 13%
Insider risk managementSecurity operations0%64 of 840%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mimecast yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mimecast across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mimecast, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mimecast was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management2 of 51Not among the top eight
Forcepoint DLP2 of 50Not among the top eight
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint2 of 50Not among the top eight
Netskope2 of 50Not among the top eight
Proofpoint2 of 50Not among the top eight
Proofpoint Insider Threat Management2 of 50Not among the top eight
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint2 of 50Not among the top eight
Splunk2 of 50Not among the top eight
Zscaler2 of 50Not among the top eight
Above Security1 of 51Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mimecast. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 5 answers that named Mimecast and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forcepoint.com2
learn.microsoft.com2
aimultiple.com1
breachsense.com1
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com1
currentware.com1
cyberhaven.com1
exabeam.com1
expertinsights.com1
gartner.com1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Mimecast came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

mimecast.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mimecast takes 0% of first choices and cside takes 13%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “client-side protection tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “client-side protection tools”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 148,929 a month
Searches its site ranks for
12,907 · 1,030 in the top three
Sites linking to it
56,562
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
75+ ads · 75 text · 21 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2025, as MIMECAST NORTH AMERICA, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 38 in the year, 37 before. 45 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 94 of 120 in client-side protection
Segment leader
13%
cside
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
5 answers
Its own site cited
in 3 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on mimecast.com
7,780
subdomains included
Content
824
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
51 · 7
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog30432026-08-27Email security, DLP
News or press23512026-08-03Email security, XDR
Report or ebook8602025-09-19Email security, DLP
Case study6602025-06-16Email security, PAM
Webinar or virtual event55undatedEmail security, DLP
Comparison3212026-08-27Email security
Glossary or explainer3002025-01-23Email security, MFA
Podcast or video1402026-04-23Email security
Conference or event102019-09-17
Template or tool1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page mimecast.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name email security (34); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Mimecast

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Mimecast is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Human Risk Management & Advanced Email Security
For
organizations
Integrations claimed
300 mimecast.com
Certifications
ISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO/IEC 27701:2019ISO 22301:2019ISO/IEC 42001:2023ISO 14001:2015Cyber EssentialsCyber Essentials PlusSOC 2 Type 2
Customers named
MoffittLyftBoston Red SoxBankedPIB GroupMayflower GroupsenataBLG
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What Mimecast's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: mimecast.com, trust.mimecast.com, mimecast.com/products, mimecast.com/resources/case-studies, mimecast.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mimecast's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mimecast, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mimecast by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Mimecast is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mimecast, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mimecast.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.