AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Microsoft Process Mining · October 2026 Edition
Microsoft · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Microsoft Process Mining

6Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Microsoft Process Mining was named 1 time in Process mining, where Apromore led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In process mining · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft Process Mining for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Process miningIT operations and endpoint0%58 of 61100%1under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Process Mining yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Process Mining across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Verdict: Caution, especially if you're not deeply embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem. It's often characterized as immature” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Process mining · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Process Mining, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Process Mining was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform6 of 62Not among the top eight
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence5 of 60Not among the top eight
UiPath Process Mining5 of 60Not among the top eight
IBM Process Mining4 of 60Not among the top eight
Apromore3 of 60Not among the top eight
Signavio2 of 60Not among the top eight
ProcessMind1 of 61Not among the top eight
SAP Process Mining by Celonis1 of 61Not among the top eight
ABBYY Timeline1 of 60Not among the top eight
ARIS1 of 60Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Process Mining. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Microsoft Process Mining and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com4
softwaresuggest.com4
learn.g2.com3
assets.ctfassets.net2
bardeen.ai2
erpresearch.com2
gartner.com2
omr.com2
process.st2
processmind.com2

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Process Mining came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Microsoft Process Mining

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft Process Mining; a claim can dispute any of them.
Microsoft Process Mining (Power Automate) 1

Follow Microsoft Process Mining

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Microsoft is the company behind Microsoft Process Mining.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Optimieren Sie Prozesse, und entdecken Sie Geschäftsautomatisierungsmöglichkeiten mit Task und Process Mining.
Price stated
Prueba gratuita: Gratuito durante 30 días. Power Automate Premium: 13,00 € usuario al mes, pagado anualmente. Power Automate Process: 130,00 € bot al mes, pagado anualmente. microsoft.com/es-es/power-platform/products/power-automate
Free plan or trial
Experimente Power Automate, incluidas las características premium, gratis durante 30 días. microsoft.com/es-es/power-platform/products/power-automate
Certifications
valmiita sertifioitua liitintä
Hosting
pilvipalvelu
Customers named
NsureUberCoreLogicBrisa

What Microsoft Process Mining's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: microsoft.com/de-de/power-platform/products/power-automate, microsoft.com/es-es/power-platform/products/power-automate, microsoft.com/fi-fi/power-platform/products/power-automate, microsoft.com/fr-fr/power-platform/products/power-automate, microsoft.com/it-it/power-platform/products/power-automate. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Process Mining's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Process Mining, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Process Mining by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Microsoft Process Mining is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Process Mining, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.