AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › ABBYY Timeline · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

ABBYY Timeline

18Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ABBYY Timeline was named 8 times in Process mining, where Apromore led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In process mining · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ABBYY Timeline for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Process miningIT operations and endpoint0%25 of 6112%8under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ABBYY Timeline yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ABBYY Timeline across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01012
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Good process intelligence platform with strong OCR/document processing capabilities” MiniMax M2.5 · Process mining · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Unique focus on unstructured/semi-structured data from documents (IDP integration)” Kimi K2 · Process mining · comparative prompt · alternative
“Multimodal (logs + documents/images/text); predictive modeling.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Process mining · comparative prompt · alternative
“ABBYY Timeline (Best for Document-Heavy Processes)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Process mining · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“avoid pure enterprises like Celonis/ABBYY unless growing fast” Grok 4.1 Fast · Process mining · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ABBYY Timeline, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ABBYY Timeline was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform17 of 189Not among the top eight
UiPath Process Mining15 of 181Not among the top eight
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence15 of 180Not among the top eight
IBM Process Mining9 of 181Not among the top eight
Apromore9 of 180Not among the top eight
Appian8 of 180Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power Automate6 of 181Not among the top eight
MEHRWERK6 of 180Not among the top eight
ARIS3 of 180Not among the top eight
Microsoft Process Advisor3 of 180Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ABBYY Timeline. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 18 answers that named ABBYY Timeline and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

erpresearch.com11
research.oz.spotlightar.com11
bardeen.ai10
processmind.com10
processexcellencenetwork.com9
solutionsreview.com9
abbyy.comYour site7
decisions.com7
ciopages.com6
guideflow.com6

Seventy-nine of the eighty-six domain citations in answers naming ABBYY Timeline came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

abbyy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ABBYY Timeline takes 0% of first choices and Apromore takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “process mining tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “process mining tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
30 a month (“abbyy timeline”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 36,786 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,975 · 199 in the top three
Sites linking to it
11,286
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
28 ads · 24 text, 2 image, 2 video · 14 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2021, as ABBYY USA SOFTWARE HOUSE, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 12 in the year, 16 before. 31 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 61 in process mining
Segment leader
19%
Apromore
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
18 answers
Its own site cited
in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on abbyy.com
3,083
subdomains included
Content
1,213
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
61 · 236
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog495undatedRPA, Process mining
News or press311undatedRPA, Document processing
Webinar or virtual event111undatedProcess mining, RPA
Report or ebook86undatedDocument processing, Process mining
Case study82undatedDocument processing, RPA
Glossary or explainer61undatedProcess mining
Conference or event35undated
Comparison17undatedProcess mining, RPA
Template or tool10undated
Podcast or video5undatedDocument processing

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on abbyy.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page abbyy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name document processing (34); 24 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as ABBYY Timeline

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ABBYY Timeline; a claim can dispute any of them.
ABBYY 2

Follow ABBYY Timeline

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ABBYY Timeline is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
our cloud platform for process mining, task mining, and simulation
For
businesses
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 2
Customers named
McDonald'sSiemensYum! BrandsPepsiCoVolkswagen UKDeloitteFujifilmErste Group
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What ABBYY Timeline's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: abbyy.com, trust.abbyy.com, abbyy.com/products, abbyy.com/customer-stories, abbyy.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ABBYY Timeline's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ABBYY Timeline, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ABBYY Timeline by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ABBYY Timeline is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ABBYY Timeline, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at abbyy.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.