| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Process mining | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 26 of 61 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Microsoft Process Advisor – mining inside Power Platform, accessible for Microsoft ecosystems.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Process mining · comparative prompt · alternative
“Microsoft Process Advisor (if Microsoft 365/Power Platform dominant)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Process mining · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Affordable entry point, integrated with Microsoft 365 ecosystem” Kimi K2 · Process mining · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Microsoft ecosystem users” MiniMax M2.5 · Process mining · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 8 answers that named Microsoft Process Advisor and are not a share of its labels.
Forty of the forty domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Process Advisor came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Microsoft Process Advisor's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: microsoft.com/en-ca/power-platform/products/power-automate/topics/process-mining/what-is-process-mining, microsoft.com/en-gb/power-platform/products/power-automate/topics/process-mining/what-is-process-mining, microsoft.com/en-au/power-platform/products/power-automate/topics/process-mining/what-is-process-mining, microsoft.com/en-ie/power-platform/products/power-automate/topics/process-mining/what-is-process-mining, microsoft.com/en-nz/power-platform/products/power-automate/topics/process-mining/what-is-process-mining. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Process Advisor's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Process Advisor, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Process Advisor by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: