AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Microsoft Process Advisor · October 2026 Edition
Microsoft · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Microsoft Process Advisor

8Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Microsoft Process Advisor was named 4 times in Process mining, where Apromore led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In process mining · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft Process Advisor for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Process miningIT operations and endpoint0%26 of 610%4under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Process Advisor yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Process Advisor across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Microsoft Process Advisor – mining inside Power Platform, accessible for Microsoft ecosystems.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Process mining · comparative prompt · alternative
“Microsoft Process Advisor (if Microsoft 365/Power Platform dominant)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Process mining · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Affordable entry point, integrated with Microsoft 365 ecosystem” Kimi K2 · Process mining · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Microsoft ecosystem users” MiniMax M2.5 · Process mining · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Process Advisor, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Process Advisor was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform7 of 84Not among the top eight
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence7 of 81Not among the top eight
UiPath Process Mining6 of 81Not among the top eight
Apromore4 of 80Not among the top eight
ABBYY Timeline3 of 80Not among the top eight
IBM Process Mining3 of 80Not among the top eight
MEHRWERK2 of 80Not among the top eight
QPR ProcessAnalyzer2 of 80Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power Automate1 of 81Not among the top eight
ARIS1 of 80Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Process Advisor. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 8 answers that named Microsoft Process Advisor and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

scribe.com7
ciopages.com5
research.oz.spotlightar.com5
g2.com4
processmind.com4
bardeen.ai3
beefed.ai3
decisions.com3
processexcellencenetwork.com3
us.fitgap.com3

Forty of the forty domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Process Advisor came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Microsoft Process Advisor

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Microsoft is the company behind Microsoft Process Advisor.
ShowHide
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Process Advisor's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Process Advisor, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Process Advisor by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Microsoft Process Advisor is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Process Advisor, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.