2 categories · Named, not rankedCyrisma
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyber risk quantification | Security operations | 4% | 11 of 116 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25% | |
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 0% | 71 of 77 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Cyrisma across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Mid-market accessible CRQ | CyberSaint, Kovrr, Cyrisma | Budget-conscious; fast time-to-value” Kimi K2 · Cyber risk quant · scale prompt · first choice
“It's rated as best overall and best value among mid-market options.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Alerting mechanism is poorly designed” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Vuln management · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cyrisma, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cyrisma was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Cyrisma and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Cyrisma came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 67 | undated | GRC, MFA | ||
| News or press | 17 | undated | |||
| Case study | 5 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | XDR | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cyrisma.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Cyrisma
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Cyrisma is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- a unified cyber risk and compliance platform for MSPs to identify and reduce cyber risk
- For
- Managed Service Providers (MSPs) and Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs)
- Free plan or trial
- Start for free cyrisma.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2
- Hosting
- GlobalUS
- Customers named
- OrbitalFireSecuricomCyFlareBuena Vista UniversityAuto Lenders
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations
What Cyrisma's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: cyrisma.com, trust.cyrisma.com, cyrisma.com/platform-overview, cyrisma.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cyrisma's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cyrisma, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cyrisma by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Cyrisma is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cyrisma, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.