AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Black Kite · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Black Kite

22Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Black Kite was named 9 times in Cyber risk quant and 1 other category, where CyberSaint CyberStrong led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cyber risk quant · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Black Kite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Cyber risk quantificationSecurity operations0%26 of 1160%6under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25%
Third-party risk managementSecurity operations0%57 of 8733%3under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 55%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Black Kite yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Black Kite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best suited for organizations that prioritize standards-based risk ratings, FAIR-aligned financial risk quantification” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · alternative
“Need continuous cyber monitoring of vendors: Bitsight, SecurityScorecard, Black Kite, RiskRecon.” GPT-5.4 mini · TPRM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Focuses on third-party risk quantification and provides good value for B2B companies” MiniMax M2.5 · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · alternative
“Black Kite is distinct because it automates the quantification of third-party risk” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cyber risk quant · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Do not use these platforms as your *sole* source of truth.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · TPRM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Black Kite, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Black Kite was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
RiskLens12 of 221Not among the top eight
Bitsight11 of 223Not among the top eight
SAFE Security9 of 224Not among the top eight
SecurityScorecard9 of 221Not among the top eight
Axio9 of 220Not among the top eight
Kovrr9 of 220Not among the top eight
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management7 of 222Not among the top eight
UpGuard7 of 221Not among the top eight
MetricStream5 of 220Not among the top eight
RiskRecon5 of 220Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Black Kite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Black Kite and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

blackkite.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Black Kite takes 0% of first choices and CyberSaint CyberStrong takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “cyber risk quantification tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cyber risk quantification tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
6,600 a month (“black kite”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
213 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 5,470 a month
Searches its site ranks for
14,395 · 21 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,856
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
22 ads · 22 text · 6 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2024, as Norbella, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 3 in the year, 19 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 26 of 116 in cyber risk quant
Segment leader
25%
CyberSaint CyberStrong
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
22 answers
Its own site cited
in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on blackkite.com
1,087
subdomains included
Content
877
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
28 · 5
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog493162026-09-25TPRM, Patching
Report or ebook21522026-09-17TPRM
News or press7752026-09-15TPRM
Podcast or video5052026-09-23TPRM
Case study1202025-10-10
Glossary or explainer1102023-10-03TPRM, Patching
Comparison822026-09-09
Webinar or virtual event502026-06-12
Conference or event512026-09-22TPRM
Template or tool102022-06-28
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page blackkite.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Black Kite

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Black Kite is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The AI-native third-party cyber risk management platform built for modern TPCRM programs. Continuous intelligence, standards-based data, and Open FAIR™ impact.
For
Security and risk teams
Certifications
SOC 2TX-RAMPGDPRStateRAMP MemberISO 27001:2022CSA Star Level OneCSA Trusted Cloud ProviderSOC 2 Type II
Hosting
United States
Customers named
MarkelBCBSBNY MellonHealthfirstHIG CapitalLPL Financial
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What Black Kite's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: blackkite.com, trust.blackkite.com, blackkite.com/platform, blackkite.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Black Kite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Black Kite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Black Kite by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Black Kite is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Black Kite, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at blackkite.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.