IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Matrix42 · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Matrix42

9Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Matrix42 was named 3 times in UEM, where Microsoft Intune led with 43%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business41 of 59

under the label threshold

Mid-market36 of 52

under the label threshold

Enterprise35 of 57

under the label threshold

In uem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Matrix42 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Unified endpoint management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	36 of 52	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Intune at 43%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Matrix42 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Matrix42 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“These platforms score lower in head-to-head comparisons ... They may lack the breadth and depth required for most enterprise environments.” Mistral Small · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Matrix42, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Matrix42 was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Intune8 of 97Not in the top three

Ivanti8 of 90Not in the top three

Jamf8 of 90Not in the top three

Omnissa Workspace ONE7 of 92Not in the top three

Baramundi7 of 90Not in the top three

SOTI6 of 90Not in the top three

42Gears SureMDM5 of 90Not in the top three

ManageEngine5 of 90Not in the top three

Sophos Mobile5 of 90Not in the top three

Citrix3 of 90Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Matrix42. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Matrix42 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org9

gbhackers.com9

cybersecuritynews.com5

ciopages.com4

softwarereviews.com4

cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com3

leonidastek.com3

nhimg.org3

techvendorindex.com3

expertinsights.com2

Forty-five of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Matrix42 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/uem-solutions-by-business-size9

gbhackers.com/best-uem-solutions-compared9

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/endpoint-management-uem4

cybersecuritynews.com/best-uem-solutions/amp4

softwarereviews.com/awards/data-quadrant-awards-2024-unified-endpoint-management4

cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/final/en-us/microsoft-bran3

leonidastek.com/blog/unified-endpoint-management3

nhimg.org/faq/what-should-organisations-look-for-in-a-unified-endpoint-management-platform3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Matrix42's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Matrix42, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at matrix42.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.