IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Baramundi · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Baramundi

11Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Baramundi was named 5 times in UEM, where Microsoft Intune led with 43%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business51 of 59

under the label threshold

Mid-market38 of 52

under the label threshold

Enterprise33 of 57

under the label threshold

In uem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Baramundi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Unified endpoint management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	38 of 52	40%	5	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Intune at 43%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Baramundi yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Baramundi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“recommended only for very specific regional or service-management integration needs” Mistral Small · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative

“Limited global reach, partner ecosystem gaps | For multi-region deployments” Kimi K2 · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Baramundi, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Baramundi was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Intune10 of 118Not in the top three

Jamf10 of 110Not in the top three

Omnissa Workspace ONE9 of 111Not in the top three

ManageEngine9 of 110Not in the top three

Ivanti8 of 110Not in the top three

Matrix427 of 110Not in the top three

SOTI6 of 110Not in the top three

Sophos Mobile5 of 110Not in the top three

42Gears SureMDM4 of 110Not in the top three

Citrix3 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Baramundi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Baramundi and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org9

gbhackers.com9

ciopages.com5

cybersecuritynews.com5

softwarereviews.com5

expertinsights.com4

syncrosecure.com4

cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com3

leonidastek.com3

techvendorindex.com3

Fifty of the fifty domain citations in answers naming Baramundi came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/uem-solutions-by-business-size9

gbhackers.com/best-uem-solutions-compared9

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/endpoint-management-uem5

cybersecuritynews.com/best-uem-solutions/amp5

softwarereviews.com/awards/data-quadrant-awards-2024-unified-endpoint-management5

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-unified-endpoint-management-uem-solutions4

syncrosecure.com/blog/unified-endpoint-management-tools4

cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/final/en-us/microsoft-bran3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Baramundi

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Baramundi; a claim can dispute any of them.

baramundi 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Baramundi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Baramundi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at baramundi.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.