Network monitoring and management · October 2026 Edition
Auvik vs ManageEngine OpManager
Three of fourteen models named Auvik first on the direct prompt; seven named ManageEngine OpManager. Both were named by all fourteen models and Auvik carries 33 labels and ManageEngine OpManager 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
First-choice share26%22%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%6%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3335A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Auvik reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Auvik vs Zabbix · Auvik vs Paessler PRTG Network Monitor · Auvik vs LibreNMS
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the network monitoring and management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AuvikFirst choices, of fourteen modelsManageEngine OpManager
Direct37
Paraphrase102
Comparative00
Budget-constrained02
Scale-constrained11
Negative002 against ManageEngine OpManager
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Auvik and ManageEngine OpManager were named in the same answer forty-five times, of the 101 answers naming Auvik and the 194 naming ManageEngine OpManager. In those answers ManageEngine OpManager took the first choice nine times and Auvik ten.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Auvik and ManageEngine OpManager stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Auvik ManageEngine OpManager first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Auvik on the left and ManageEngine OpManager on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Auvik and ManageEngine OpManager stood in it.
Auvik first, ManageEngine OpManager an alternative
3 of 14 modelsManageEngine OpManager was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashAuvik alternatives: LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
DeepSeek V4 FlashAuvik alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
GPT-6 LunaAuvik alternatives: LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, Site24x7
ManageEngine OpManager first, Auvik an alternative
7 of 14 modelsAuvik was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor alternatives: Zabbix
Perplexity SonarManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, Domotz, LogicMonitor
Grok 4.1 FastManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Progress WhatsUp Gold
Qwen 3.7 FlashManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor, Progress WhatsUp Gold, Zabbix
Kimi K2ManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Auvik, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, Progress WhatsUp Gold
MiniMax M2.5ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler's PRTG Network Monitor alternatives: Zabbix
Muse Glimmer 30BManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Auvik, Datadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor, Progress WhatsUp Gold, Site24x7, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Mistral SmallLogicMonitor alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, ManageEngine OpManager
GLM 4.7 FlashXPaessler PRTG Network Monitor alternatives: ManageEngine OpManager, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniSolarWinds Network Performance Monitor alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, Zabbix
Llama 4 MaverickDatadog Network Monitoring alternatives: Nagios, Netdata
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
ManageEngine OpManager leads by two points.
ManageEngine OpManager7%#4 of 12Auvik5%#5 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Auvik leads at mid-market.
Auvik26%#1 of 12ManageEngine OpManager22%#2 of 12Enterprise
Auvik leads by two points.
Auvik5%#5 of 12ManageEngine OpManager4%#6 of 12What the models said about Auvik
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“I'd recommend starting with Auvik if you have a decent IT budget and want the most polished, comprehensive network management + automation experience” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Go with Auvik if you have a lean IT team that needs instant visibility, automated network mapping, and hassle-free configuration backups” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Auvik or Domotz: These are cloud-based, incredibly easy to deploy... They are heavily favored by lean IT teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about ManageEngine OpManager
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Be very cautious with ManageEngine; while feature-rich and cost-effective, their historical susceptibility to remote code execution requires rigorous security hardening” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Has experienced multiple vulnerabilities including authentication bypass, remote code execution, and cross-site scripting issues” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“ManageEngine OpManager and Progress WhatsUp Gold frequently hit the sweet spot of features vs. cost” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“The best network monitoring tool for a company with a limited budget is ManageEngine OpManager” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Auvik vs ZabbixAuvik vs Paessler PRTG Network MonitorAuvik vs LibreNMSAuvik vs Datadog Network MonitoringAuvik vs NagiosAuvik vs LogicMonitorManageEngine OpManager vs ZabbixManageEngine OpManager vs Paessler PRTG Network MonitorManageEngine OpManager vs LibreNMSManageEngine OpManager vs Datadog Network MonitoringManageEngine OpManager vs NagiosManageEngine OpManager vs LogicMonitorAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full network monitoring standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.