AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Paessler PRTG Network Monitor · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Paessler PRTG Network Monitor

171Judge labels
37First choices
16Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
40% in Network monitoring for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 78 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 52 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Paessler PRTG Network Monitor →
By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.
In network monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Paessler PRTG Network Monitor for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Network monitoring and managementNetwork and edge11%4 of 784%52accepted challenger
Network detection and responseSecurity operations5%4 of 10210%10accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Paessler PRTG Network Monitor yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Paessler PRTG Network Monitor across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.532005
GPT-5.4 mini02204
Gemini 3.5 Flash05005
Perplexity Sonar02103
Grok 4.1 Fast13307
Mistral Small02103
DeepSeek V4 Flash04217
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash22116
Kimi K205106
GLM 4.7 FlashX14005
MiniMax M2.500213
GPT-6 Luna02103
Muse Glimmer 30B30104

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct23 labels10
Paraphrase37 labels15
Comparative35 labels12not counted in share
Budget-constrained35 labels9
Scale-constrained17 labels3
Negative24 labels8not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative171 labels in all, every segment counted; 37 of the 57 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“PRTG is positioned as the broadest out-of-the-box package for small to mid-sized IT teams that want a quick start with broad coverage.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Network monitoring · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Auvik or PRTG Network Monitor as top network management and automation software options” Grok 4.1 Fast · Network monitoring · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: Paessler PRTG Network Monitor ... widely considered the gold standard for Small to Medium Businesses” Qwen 3.7 Flash · NDR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most small-to-medium businesses with limited IT staff, a freemium tool like PRTG often provides the best value.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Network monitoring · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“basic PRTG setups... Do not rely on these for actual network defense.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · NDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Has had vulnerabilities including CSS injection (CVE-2022-35739) and other issues” MiniMax M2.5 · Network monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
“PRTG — costs scale poorly and setup can be overwhelming” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Network monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, over the 171 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Paessler PRTG Network Monitor was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Zabbix115 of 17116Compare →
Auvik76 of 17112Compare →
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor64 of 17114Not among the top eight
Domotz26 of 17110Not among the top eight
Kentik26 of 1713Not among the top eight
Dynatrace26 of 1711Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Paessler PRTG Network Monitor. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 153 of the 171 answers that named Paessler PRTG Network Monitor and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com69
datamation.com58
comparitech.com54
netdata.cloud54
blog.domotz.com46
kentik.com46
g2.com44
manageengine.com44
learn.g2.com42
pandorafms.com39

496 of the 496 domain citations in answers naming Paessler PRTG Network Monitor came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

paessler.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor takes 11% of first choices and Auvik takes 26%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “network monitoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “network monitoring tools”
8
Searches for its name, Google
480 a month (“paessler prtg network monitor”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 107,237 a month
Searches its site ranks for
12,432 · 876 in the top three
Sites linking to it
9,224
Paid Google search
4 searches its ads show for, about 139 clicks and $12,945 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 110 text, 9 video, 1 image · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2021, as Paessler GmbH, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 2 in the year, 118 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
11%
rank 4 of 78 in network monitoring
Segment leader
26%
Auvik
First choices
37 across its categories
Named in
171 answers
Its own site cited
in 153 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on paessler.com
6,460
subdomains included
Content
1,538
counted in the table below
Documentation
71
Product · Integration
8 · 57
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,209132026-09-28CDN, Infra monitoring
Webinar or virtual event13002025-11-24
Case study74undated
Comparison7002026-03-25RMM
News or press23undated
Template or tool13undated
Glossary or explainer1202026-03-18Infra monitoring
Conference or event302018-04-06
Report or ebook202017-09-29
Podcast or video2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page paessler.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Paessler PRTG Network Monitor

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Paessler PRTG Network Monitor; a claim can dispute any of them.
PRTG Network Monitor 23PRTG 20Paessler PRTG 5PRTG Network Monitor (Paessler) 1PRTG Network Monitor (by Paessler) 1Paessler PRTG (Free Version) 1Paessler PRTG Network Monitor Free Edition 1Prtg Network Monitor 1

Follow Paessler PRTG Network Monitor

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Paessler PRTG Network Monitor is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Complete Network Monitoring. Zero Blind Spots.
For
From a one-person IT team to a global MSP
Price stated
per month paid annually paessler.com/pricing
Starting price
179 paessler.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
FREE TRIAL paessler.com
Customers named
Zurich AirportTAFJORDJena University HospitalLeica Geosystems AGSkyscannerIntegrated Precision SystemsDr. Erler Kliniken
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting

What Paessler PRTG Network Monitor's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: paessler.com, paessler.com/pricing, paessler.com/monitoring/security, paessler.com/prtg/features/alerts, paessler.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Paessler PRTG Network Monitor's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Paessler PRTG Network Monitor by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Paessler PRTG Network Monitor is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at paessler.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.