Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 37 → 23 of 53
ManageEngine · 1 category · Named, not rankedManageEngine EventLog Analyzer
18Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer was named 5 times in Logs, where Datadog Log Management led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business23 of 56
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market19 of 73
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise22 of 66
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In logs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 19 of 73 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Datadog Log Management at 28% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Logs · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 10 → 19 of 66
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 of 62, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logs | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 19 of 73 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase10 labels3
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If Windows event logs are your priority: ManageEngine ELA and SolarWinds LEM offer the simplest path.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Logs · budget prompt · alternative
“or ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer if compliance requirements are important” MiniMax M2.5 · Logs · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“better if compliance reporting and regulatory requirements are a major driver” Perplexity Sonar · Logs · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 18 answers that named ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learn.g2.com8
coralogix.com7
cribl.io7
expertinsights.com7
g2.com7
gitnux.org6
guideflow.com6
manageengine.comYour site6
middleware.io6
openobserve.ai6
Sixty of the sixty-six domain citations in answers naming ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 140 a month (“manageengine eventlog analyzer”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 13 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on ManageEngine's site (manageengine.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 73 in logs
Segment leader
28%
Datadog Log Management
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 18 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 18 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer; a claim can dispute any of them.
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer (ELA) 1
Follow ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ManageEngine is the company behind ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer.ShowHide
The company
ManageEngine is the company behind ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- software de monitoramento e relatório de log baseado em agente
- For
- Organizations
- Price stated
- USD 595 manageengine.com/products/eventlog/vpn-log-analyzer.html
- Starting price
- 595 manageengine.com/products/eventlog/vpn-log-analyzer.html
- Free plan or trial
- avaliação gratuita manageengine.com/br/eventlog/collect-eventlogs.html
- Customers named
- Los Alamos National BankMichigan State UniversityPanasonicComcastOklahoma State UniversityIBMAccentureBank of America
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: manageengine.com/academy/manageengine-log-analyzer.html, manageengine.com/br/eventlog/collect-eventlogs.html, manageengine.com/fr/eventlog/importing-eventlogs.html, manageengine.com/de/eventlog/eventLogs-importieren.html, manageengine.com/products/eventlog/vpn-log-analyzer.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.