Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 27 → 15 of 59
2 categories · Named, not rankedAlertOps
14Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AlertOps was named 3 times in Incidents and 1 other category, where incident.io led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business15 of 63
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market20 of 65
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise28 of 44
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In incidents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named AlertOps for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incident management and on-call | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 20 of 65 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by incident.io at 32% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AIOps platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 36 of 93 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 17% |
Movement
Since September 2026, AlertOps held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Incidents · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 40 → 22 of 57
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 17 → 22 of 39
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incidents | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 40 → 20 of 65 |
| AIOps | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 36 of 93, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated AlertOps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated AlertOps across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase6 labels2
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“AlertOps is a robust, budget-friendly alternative that punches well above its weight class in the mid-market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AIOps · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If you want a more budget-friendly option, AlertOps is worth considering.” Mistral Small · Incidents · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Need a paid plan with the lowest per-user cost: AlertOps ~$8/user/month” Muse Glimmer 30B · Incidents · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AlertOps, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AlertOps was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AlertOps, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AlertOps was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AlertOps. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 14 answers that named AlertOps and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com7
motadata.com7
rootly.com7
alertops.comYour site6
complyjet.com6
cybernews.com6
incident.io6
capterra.com4
expertinsights.com4
freshworks.com4
Fifty-one of the fifty-seven domain citations in answers naming AlertOps came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
alertops.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AlertOps takes 0% of first choices and incident.io takes 32%.ShowHide
Search and answers
alertops.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AlertOps takes 0% of first choices and incident.io takes 32%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “incident management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “incident management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“alertops”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 5,822 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 965 · 27 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 991
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 12 clicks and $383 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 65 in incidents
Segment leader
32%
incident.io
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 13 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on alertops.com
789
subdomains included
Content
202
counted in the table below
Documentation
346
Product · Integration
40 · 133
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 162 | 18 | 2026-09-23 | APM, ITSM | |
| Comparison | 24 | 2 | 2026-08-26 | ||
| Case study | 5 | 2 | 2026-07-27 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 4 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-04-09 | ||
| News or press | 3 | 3 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2026-05-14 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Alertops ada ai incident response news or press
- 2026-09-25Infra structure summit conference or event
- 2026-09-25724 exchange conference or event
- 2026-09-25Ptcdc conference or event
- 2026-09-25Techcon unplugged conference or event
- 2026-09-23Meet agent ada blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page alertops.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow AlertOps
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
AlertOps is its own company.ShowHide
The company
AlertOps is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered incident management platform
- For
- enterprises
- Price stated
- Free $0/month (max 5 users); Standard $8 /user/month; Premium $18 /user/month; Enterprise $28 /user/month alertops.com
- Starting price
- 0 alertops.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free $0/month (max 5 users); Free Trial alertops.com
- Integrations claimed
- 200 alertops.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIGDPR compliantFedRAMP AuthorizedGDPR
- Hosting
- Microsoft Azuremulti-region redundancyUS data residency available
- Customers named
- Delta DentalPenumbraWCAtechNisaHeiden Technology SolutionsTRNSFRMUS itekSecurus
What AlertOps's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: alertops.com, alertops.com/pricing, alertops.com/company/security, alertops.com/platform, alertops.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AlertOps's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AlertOps, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AlertOps by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AlertOps is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AlertOps, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.