IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Mamori.io · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Mamori.io

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mamori.io was named 1 time in PAM, where ManageEngine PAM360 led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business36 of 55

under the label threshold

Mid-market33 of 74

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In pam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mamori.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Privileged access management	Identity and access	0%	33 of 74	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine PAM360 at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mamori.io yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mamori.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Small businesses needing database-focused PAM” Kimi K2 · PAM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mamori.io, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mamori.io was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

JumpServer3 of 32Not in the top three

ManageEngine PAM3603 of 30Not in the top three

Teleport2 of 32Not in the top three

BeyondTrust2 of 30Not in the top three

CyberArk2 of 30Not in the top three

Delinea Secret Server2 of 30Not in the top three

KeeperPAM2 of 30Not in the top three

Admin By Request1 of 31Not in the top three

Delinea1 of 30Not in the top three

Devolutions Password Hub1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mamori.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Mamori.io and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aimultiple.com3

jumpserver.com3

mamori.ioYour site3

startwithidentity.com3

adminbyrequest.com2

costbench.com2

github.com2

opensourcetools.org2

pamcost.com2

apispine.com1

Twenty of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Mamori.io came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aimultiple.com/free-pam-solution3

aimultiple.com/pam-solutions3

jumpserver.com/3

mamori.io/free-pam-solution3

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-pam-for-smb3

github.com/jumpserver/jumpserver2

opensourcetools.org/category/privileged-access-management2

adminbyrequest.com/en/blogs/top-10-privileged-access-management-tools-for-20241

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Mamori.io

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mamori.io; a claim can dispute any of them.

Mamori.io Free PAM 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mamori.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mamori.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mamori.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.