IT AI Index
Index Vendors › JumpServer · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

JumpServer

14Judge labels
5First choices
0Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. JumpServer was named 7 times in PAM, where ManageEngine PAM360 led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In pam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named JumpServer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Privileged access managementIdentity and access6%6 of 740%7under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine PAM360 at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for JumpServer yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated JumpServer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels5
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“My top pick: If you have technical expertise, JumpServer or Teleport Community offer full-featured PAM for free.” Kimi K2 · PAM · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall: JumpServer (Community Edition) – free, full‑featured, self‑hosted.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PAM · budget prompt · first choice
“JumpServer (free, quick to deploy). You get real PAM with zero license cost.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PAM · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have zero software budget but strong in-house DevOps talent: Spin up a self-hosted instance of JumpServer.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PAM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as JumpServer, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JumpServer was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ManageEngine PAM36012 of 144Not in the top three
CyberArk11 of 141Not in the top three
KeeperPAM9 of 142Not in the top three
Teleport8 of 140Not in the top three
Delinea7 of 141Not in the top three
BeyondTrust7 of 140Not in the top three
StrongDM5 of 141Not in the top three
HashiCorp Boundary4 of 140Not in the top three
HashiCorp Vault4 of 140Not in the top three
Admin By Request3 of 141Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named JumpServer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 14 answers that named JumpServer and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

jumpserver.comYour site11
startwithidentity.com10
aimultiple.com7
opensourcetools.org6
gartner.com5
learn.g2.com5
pamcost.com5
costbench.com4
cybersectool.com4
heimdalsecurity.com4

Fifty of the sixty-one domain citations in answers naming JumpServer came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as JumpServer

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as JumpServer; a claim can dispute any of them.
JumpServer Community Edition 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JumpServer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JumpServer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jumpserver.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack