Every category where a model named Infisical for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Secrets management	Identity and access	18%	3 of 40	5%	40	accepted challenger
Privileged access management	Identity and access	0%	44 of 74	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine PAM360 at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Infisical yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Infisical across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	3	0	0	6
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	2	0	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	1	0	4
Mistral Small	1	1	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	1	1	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	2	1	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	5	0	0	6
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	3	1	0	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct24 labels5

Paraphrase13 labels1

Comparative28 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained26 labels15

Scale-constrained12 labels4

Negative20 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative123 labels in all, every segment counted; 25 of the 32 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For the best balance of cost and features, Infisical (self-hosted) and Bitwarden Secrets Manager (SaaS) are the most budget-friendly options” Mistral Small · Secrets · budget prompt · first choice

“Doppler or Infisical are solid choices due to their balance of features, ease of use, and developer-friendly approach” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Secrets · direct prompt · first choice

“A modern, developer-friendly open-source alternative to Doppler... Set up a trial of Doppler or Infisical” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secrets · scale prompt · first choice

“Choose Infisical (Self-Hosted) if you want a beautiful, modern, enterprise-ready UI with maximum features” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secrets · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Younger ecosystem; also note that Infisical Cloud dropped default end-to-end encryption” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Secrets · negative prompt · soft negative

“Infisical may be a relatively new and untested ecosystem” Llama 4 Maverick · Secrets · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Infisical, over the 122 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Infisical was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HashiCorp Vault116 of 12229Compare →

Doppler113 of 12232Compare →

AWS Secrets Manager98 of 1223Not in the top three

Azure Key Vault65 of 1222Not in the top three

Google Secret Manager59 of 1221Not in the top three

1Password53 of 1223Not in the top three

Akeyless48 of 1227Not in the top three

Bitwarden Secrets Manager39 of 1223Not in the top three

OpenBao31 of 1220Not in the top three

CyberArk Conjur30 of 1220Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Infisical. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 98 of the 122 answers that named Infisical and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.gitguardian.com75

envmanager.com67

startwithidentity.com59

infisical.comYour site47

cybervendorguide.com38

doppler.com38

safeguard.sh38

guideflow.com32

worldmetrics.org27

akeyless.io26

400 of the 447 domain citations in answers naming Infisical came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blog.gitguardian.com/top-secrets-management-tools75

envmanager.com/blog/best-secrets-management-tools65

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-secrets-management-tools50

guideflow.com/blog/secrets-management-software32

cybervendorguide.com/guides/secrets-management28

worldmetrics.org/best/secrets-management-software27

pickmysoft.com/blog/best-secrets-management-tools26

cycode.com/blog/best-secrets-management-tools25

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Infisical

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Infisical; a claim can dispute any of them.

Infisical (Community Edition) 1Infisical (self-hosted) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Infisical's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Infisical, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at infisical.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.