AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Google Secret Manager · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Google Secret Manager

114Judge labels
1First choices
22Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Secrets for enterprise buyers
Rank 12 of 59 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 31 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Google Secret Manager →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In secrets · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Secret Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Secrets managementIdentity and access0%12 of 5910%31accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Non-human identity managementIdentity and access0%64 of 1280%1under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14%

Movement

Since September 2026, Google Secret Manager held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Secrets · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 7 of 41
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 12 of 54
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 14 of 53

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Secrets0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 10 → 12 of 59
NHI management0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 64 of 128, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Google Secret Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash04105
Perplexity Sonar01113
Grok 4.2002215
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna02002
Muse Glimmer 30B01203

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labelsNone
Paraphrase15 labelsNone
Comparative29 labelsNone
Budget-constrained20 labelsNone
Scale-constrained19 labels1
Negative17 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative114 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Tools like AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, or GCP Secret Manager handle the storage and dynamic rotation of credentials natively.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · NHI management · budget prompt · alternative
“Choose Google Secret Manager if you want a straightforward GCP secret store with versioning and replication.” GPT-5.4 mini · Secrets · comparative prompt · alternative
“Why it’s great: Incredibly cheap. Keeping 50 secrets active costs only $3.00/month. No maintenance overhead.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secrets · budget prompt · alternative
“can also be inexpensive for small projects, with one source describing it as costing only a few dollars a month” Perplexity Sonar · Secrets · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Cloud-vendor tools (e.g., AWS Secrets Manager, Google Secret Manager, Azure Key Vault): Why cautious? Strong vendor lock-in” Grok 4.20 · Secrets · negative prompt · soft negative
“offers a generous always-free tier and may ultimately be free though they can be complex to operate” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Secrets · budget prompt · soft negative
“can create fragmentation if you operate in multi-cloud setups” Perplexity Sonar · Secrets · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Secret Manager, over the 114 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Secret Manager was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HashiCorp Vault108 of 11440Not among the top eight
AWS Secrets Manager106 of 1145Not among the top eight
Azure Key Vault93 of 1140Not among the top eight
Doppler80 of 11427Not among the top eight
Infisical72 of 11423Not among the top eight
Akeyless51 of 1143Not among the top eight
CyberArk Conjur36 of 1140Not among the top eight
1Password34 of 1142Not among the top eight
Bitwarden Secrets Manager27 of 1142Not among the top eight
OpenBao24 of 1142Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Secret Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 102 of the 114 answers that named Google Secret Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.gitguardian.com49
infisical.com48
cybersecuritynews.com46
guideflow.com42
startwithidentity.com39
doppler.com35
akeyless.io32
cycode.com31
blog.railway.com26
cyberpress.org26

374 of the 374 domain citations in answers naming Google Secret Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cloud.google.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Google Secret Manager takes 0% of first choices and HashiCorp Vault takes 31%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “secrets management tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “secrets management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,000 a month (“google secret manager”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
46 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 7,405,347 a month
Searches its site ranks for
70,320 · 16,032 in the top three
Sites linking to it
201,334
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 12 of 59 in secrets
Segment leader
31%
HashiCorp Vault
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
114 answers
Its own site cited
in 102 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on cloud.google.com
79
subdomains included
Content
67
counted in the table below
Documentation
6
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog37142026-09-28API management
Case study19undated
Conference or event4undated
Report or ebook2undated
Glossary or explainer2undated
Webinar or virtual event1undated
Template or tool1undated
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cloud.google.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Google Secret Manager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Secret Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.
Google Cloud Secret Manager 10GCP Secret Manager 5AWS/GCP Secret Manager 1

Follow Google Secret Manager

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Google Secret Manager is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Free plan or trial
$300 in free credit cloud.google.com
Not stated on the pages read
Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Google Secret Manager's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cloud.google.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Secret Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Secret Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Secret Manager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Google Secret Manager is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Google Secret Manager, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cloud.google.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.