Index › Products › Jira · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Jira

11Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

7 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Jira was named 1 time in EA tools, where SAP LeanIX led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business60 of 126

under the label threshold

Mid-market93 of 113

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In ea tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Jira for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Enterprise architecture tools	IT operations and endpoint	0%	93 of 113	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Jira yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Jira across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“wrap Jira or Confluence processes around a spreadsheet, though this rarely scales beyond two people” Qwen 3.7 Flash · EA tools · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Jira, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jira was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SharePoint3 of 110Not among the top eight

SafetyCulture2 of 112Not among the top eight

ServiceNow Now Assist2 of 112Not among the top eight

Drata2 of 111Not among the top eight

Secureframe2 of 111Not among the top eight

Sprinto2 of 111Not among the top eight

Vanta2 of 111Not among the top eight

Archer2 of 110Not among the top eight

Asana2 of 110Not among the top eight

ClickUp2 of 110Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jira. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 11 answers that named Jira and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fortiv.io3

g2.com3

learn.g2.com3

reddit.com3

riskonnect.com3

capterra.com2

clickup.com2

em360tech.com2

gitnux.org2

ones.com2

No domain is on file for Jira, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-business-continuity-management-software3

riskonnect.com/best-business-continuity-software-compare-features-and-benefits3

clickup.com/blog/business-continuity-management-tools2

fortiv.io/blog/best-business-continuity-software2

fortiv.io/blog/buyers-guide-for-bcm-software-20262

g2.com/categories/business-continuity-management-software2

riskpublishing.com/best-business-continuity-management-software-compared2

sprinto.com/blog/business-continuity-management-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Jira

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jira's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jira, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Jira by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Jira is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Jira, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.