| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network access control | Network and edge | 35% | 1 of 111 | 7% | 45 | endorsed leader |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best budget-friendly dedicated NAC: Portnox Cloud, because it is cloud-native and emphasizes continuous access control without heavy deployment burden.” Perplexity Sonar · NAC · budget prompt · first choice
“Portnox Cloud or OPSWAT MetaAccess give you device profiling, posture enforcement and guest/BYOD without standing up dedicated appliances.” Muse Glimmer 30B · NAC · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Modern Alternatives: Agentless, cloud-native, or microsegmentation-focused (e.g., Portnox, Elisity for quick deploys without 802.1X pain)” Grok 4.1 Fast · NAC · negative prompt · first choice
“Cloud-native or hybrid options from vendors like Portnox or macmon are generally the right weight class” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NAC · scale prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Users experience performance issues with Portnox, finding it misrepresented and encountering frequent authentication problems.” Muse Glimmer 30B · NAC · negative prompt · soft negative
“Performance issues, misrepresented capabilities, frequent authentication failures, poor UI, non‑intuitive workflows.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · NAC · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution if you need rock-solid RADIUS or have complex identity federation.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NAC · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 138 of the 140 answers that named Portnox Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
501 of the 599 domain citations in answers naming Portnox Cloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 781 | 11 | 2026-09-24 | ZTNA, MFA | |
| Glossary or explainer | 166 | 4 | 2026-09-11 | ZTNA, MFA | |
| News or press | 155 | 3 | 2026-09-23 | ZTNA, MFA | |
| Report or ebook | 25 | 0 | 2026-04-23 | SD-WAN, SASE | |
| Comparison | 24 | 4 | 2026-08-17 | MFA, SASE | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 19 | 1 | 2026-09-10 | ZTNA | |
| Case study | 11 | 0 | 2026-04-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 6 | 0 | 2025-04-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2025-07-15 | ZTNA |
Every page portnox.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ZTNA (29); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Portnox Cloud's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: portnox.com, portnox.com/pricing, portnox.com/use-cases/compliance, portnox.com/use-cases, portnox.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Portnox Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Portnox Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Portnox Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Portnox Cloud first in Network access control this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.