IT AI Index

Index › Products › Informatica CDGC · October 2026 Edition

Informatica · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Informatica CDGC

3Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Informatica CDGC was named 1 time in Data catalogs, where Atlan led with 44%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market32 of 83

under the label threshold

Enterprise60 of 79

under the label threshold

In data catalogs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Informatica CDGC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Data catalogs and governance	Data platform	0%	32 of 83	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Atlan at 44%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Informatica CDGC yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Informatica CDGC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“It is a powerful choice for large organizations with massive, heterogeneous data estates” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data catalogs · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Informatica CDGC, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Informatica CDGC was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Atlan3 of 32Not among the top eight

Alation3 of 31Not among the top eight

Microsoft Purview3 of 31Not among the top eight

Collibra3 of 30Not among the top eight

DataHub2 of 30Not among the top eight

Databricks Unity Catalog2 of 30Not among the top eight

Azure Data Catalog1 of 30Not among the top eight

Decube1 of 30Not among the top eight

ER/Studio Enterprise Data Catalog1 of 30Not among the top eight

IBM1 of 30Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Informatica CDGC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Informatica CDGC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atlan.com3

alation.com2

basedash.com2

decube.io2

gartner.com2

kanerika.com2

ovaledge.com2

ataccama.com1

atscale.com1

aws.amazon.com1

Eighteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming Informatica CDGC came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

atlan.com/data-catalog-tools2

basedash.com/blog/best-data-catalog-tools-compared-20262

decube.io/post/top-data-catalog-tools2

kanerika.com/blogs/data-catalog-tools2

alation.com/blog/data-catalog-tools1

alation.com/blog/data-governance-tools1

alation.com/blog/data-management-software1

ataccama.com/blog/gartner-magic-quadrant-for-data-and-analytics-governance-platforms-2026-1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Informatica CDGC

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Informatica is the company behind Informatica CDGC.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Informatica: Informatica Axon, Informatica CLAIRE, Informatica Cloud Data Governance & Catalog, Informatica Cloud Data Governance and Catalog, Informatica Cloud Data Masking, Informatica Data & AI Governance, Privacy, Informatica Data Masking, Informatica Data Privacy Tool and 17 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Find, understand and trust your data and AI assets with headless, AI-powered data cataloging and metadata management.
informatica.com/products/data-catalog.html
For: data leaders
informatica.com/products/data-catalog.html
Price stated: consumption-based pricing informatica.com/products/data-catalog.html
Customers named: ANEELgileadsantanderbanco-brasilsaudi-airlines
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Informatica CDGC's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: informatica.com/products/data-catalog.html, informatica.com/lp/catalog-of-catalogs_3823.html, informatica.com/lp/data-cataloging-for-data-governance_3590.html, informatica.com/blogs/informaticas-data-governance-framework.html, informatica.com/blogs/streamline-ai-governance-with-informatica.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Informatica CDGC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Informatica CDGC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Informatica CDGC by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Informatica CDGC is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Informatica CDGC, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.