Every category where a model named Decube for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Data quality and observability	Data platform	0%	34 of 110	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31%
Data catalogs and governance	Data platform	0%	29 of 83	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Atlan at 44%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Decube yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Decube across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained10 labels2

Scale-constrained1 label1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Alternatives to Consider: DQLabs (AI-unified), decube, or open-source hybrids” Grok 4.1 Fast · Data observability · negative prompt · alternative

“Decube (Best for Transparent, Entry-Level Pricing)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data catalogs · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Decube, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Decube was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Metaplane11 of 214Not among the top eight

Alation7 of 211Not among the top eight

Collibra7 of 211Not among the top eight

DataHub7 of 210Not among the top eight

Bigeye6 of 210Not among the top eight

Great Expectations6 of 210Not among the top eight

Monte Carlo6 of 210Not among the top eight

Microsoft Purview5 of 211Not among the top eight

OpenMetadata5 of 211Not among the top eight

DQLabs5 of 210Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Decube. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Decube and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atlan.com18

decube.ioYour site12

learn.g2.com11

g2.com8

basedash.com7

ovaledge.com7

ir.com6

kanerika.com5

uptrace.dev5

datamation.com4

Seventy-one of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Decube came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

atlan.com/know/data-observability-tools12

learn.g2.com/best-data-observability-software11

decube.io/post/top-data-catalog-tools6

ir.com/guides/top-observability-tools-comparison-2026-smbs-vs-enterprise-platforms6

kanerika.com/blogs/data-catalog-tools5

uptrace.dev/tools/top-observability-tools5

atlan.com/data-catalog-pricing4

basedash.com/blog/best-data-catalog-tools-compared-20264

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

decube.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Decube takes 0% of first choices and Metaplane takes 31%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “data observability platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best data observability platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 90 a month (“decube”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 27 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 3,575 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,583 · 46 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 732
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

9 ads · 7 text, 2 image · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2023, as Decube Data Sdn. Bhd, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 8 in the year, 1 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 34 of 110 in data observability

Segment leader

31%

Metaplane

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 21 answers
Its own site cited: in 21 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on decube.io

791

subdomains included

Content

526

counted in the table below

Documentation

194

Product · Integration

0 · 46

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	421	5	2026-08-03	Data catalogs, ETL
Comparison	46	0	2026-07-03	Data catalogs
Glossary or explainer	40	4	2026-09-25	Data catalogs
Conference or event	7	undated
Case study	6	undated
Report or ebook	4	1	2026-07-30
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-25Glossary of terminologies glossary or explainer
2026-08-034 best practices for effective data stewardship in your organization blog
2026-08-03Data silos blog
2026-07-30Glossary category and terms glossary or explainer
2026-07-30Asset report data quality scorecard report or ebook
2026-07-29Ai governance framework blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page decube.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Decube

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Decube; a claim can dispute any of them.

decube 2

Follow Decube

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Decube is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Data Governance Tool and Context Platform. Built for AI Agents
decube.io
For: data teams and AI agents
decube.io
Price stated: Starter, Growth, Enterprise decube.io/pricing
Starting price: $175 USD/user/month decube.io/pricing
Integrations claimed: 12 decube.io
Certifications: SOC 2 CompliantISO 27001HIPAA CompliantGDPR CompliantSOC 2 Type II
Hosting: United States (US)Europe (EU)Asia Pacific (APAC)
Customers named: How a Leading Nordic Energy Company Saved 10 Hours a Week on Metadata with DecubeHow a Leading LatAm Fintech Eliminated 400 Hours of Data Work a Month with DecubeHow a Nasdaq-Listed Regional Bank Saved 110 Hours Weekly with DecubeHow an Australian Financial Institution Saved $15K a Week with DecubeHow an Indonesian Digital Bank Cut Incident Resolution Time by 55%
Not stated on the pages read: Free plan or trial

What Decube's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: decube.io, decube.io/pricing, decube.io/security, decube.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Decube's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Decube, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Decube by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Decube is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Decube, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.