AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Immersive Labs · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Immersive Labs

8Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Immersive Labs was named 3 times in Secure code training, where SecureFlag led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In secure code training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Immersive Labs for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Secure code trainingDeveloper platform0%48 of 9733%3under 10 labels · led by SecureFlag at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Immersive Labs yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Immersive Labs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01012
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Focuses heavily on hands-on cyber range labs, excellent if you want to train both your developers and your IT/Incident Response teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secure code training · scale prompt · alternative
“I'd recommend shortlisted platforms like Secure Flag or Immersive Labs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Secure code training · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“you do not need to spend tens of thousands of dollars on expensive enterprise platforms like Secure Code Warrior or Immersive Labs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secure code training · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Immersive Labs, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Immersive Labs was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SecureFlag7 of 84Not among the top eight
Secure Code Warrior7 of 82Not among the top eight
Security Journey5 of 80Not among the top eight
Snyk Learn4 of 80Not among the top eight
Veracode Security Labs3 of 80Not among the top eight
Codebashing1 of 81Not among the top eight
OpenSSF "Developing Secure Software"1 of 81Not among the top eight
PortSwigger Web Security Academy1 of 81Not among the top eight
Avatao1 of 80Not among the top eight
Checkmarx Codebashing1 of 80Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Immersive Labs. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Immersive Labs and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com5
gartner.com5
securecodewarrior.com5
securityjourney.com5
slashdot.org5
blog.secureflag.com4
peerspot.com4
ransomleak.com4
secureflag.com4
sourceforge.net4

Forty-five of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Immersive Labs came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on immersivelabs.com
1,865
subdomains included
Content
777
counted in the table below
Documentation
734
Product · Integration
19 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog457112026-09-24GRC, ASM
Conference or event9002024-04-24
Webinar or virtual event78undated
News or press7022026-07-29
Report or ebook4102021-02-03
Case study20undated
Glossary or explainer1402020-11-11
Comparison602021-01-27
Template or tool102025-07-18GRC
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page immersivelabs.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Immersive Labs

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Immersive Labs is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Immersive is a cybersecurity workforce resilience platform that enables organizations to prove, improve, benchmark and report cyber readiness through realistic drills, hands-on labs and data-driven insights.
For
organizations
Price stated
Request a Demo immersivelabs.com/platform
Customers named
HSBCKrollSpecsaversMercedes BenzElastica UK Government Agencya Law Enforcement Agencya Large Public Service Entity
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Immersive Labs's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: immersivelabs.com, immersivelabs.com/company/compliance, immersivelabs.com/platform, immersivelabs.com/resources/case-studies, immersivelabs.com/company/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Immersive Labs's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Immersive Labs, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Immersive Labs by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Immersive Labs is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Immersive Labs, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at immersivelabs.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.