IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Greencloud · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Greencloud

1Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Greencloud was named 1 time in Cloud hosting, where Amazon Web Services led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market48 of 78

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In cloud hosting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Greencloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cloud hosting	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	48 of 78	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Amazon Web Services at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Greencloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Greencloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Smaller, obscure VPS providers sometimes pop up with great reviews on affiliate sites but suffer from sudden shutdowns or refund denial policies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cloud hosting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Greencloud, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Greencloud was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Akamai Connected Cloud1 of 10Not in the top three

Amazon Web Services1 of 10Not in the top three

Azure1 of 10Not in the top three

Bluehost1 of 10Not in the top three

Contabo1 of 10Not in the top three

DigitalOcean1 of 10Not in the top three

FatCow1 of 10Not in the top three

Google Cloud1 of 10Not in the top three

Hetzner1 of 10Not in the top three

HostGator1 of 10Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Greencloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Greencloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pcmag.com1

reddit.com1

webhostingtalk.com1

Three of the three domain citations in answers naming Greencloud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pcmag.com/picks/the-best-cloud-web-hosting-services1

reddit.com/r/VPS/comments/18eu8qz/vps_providers_that_can_be_trusted_with_sensitive1

reddit.com/r/VPS/comments/1op6lly/the_best_vps_right_now_or_at_least_the_least_bad1

reddit.com/r/VPS/comments/1qtmg4a/looking_for_reliable_vps_after_losing_everything1

reddit.com/r/VPS/comments/1qyunvm/is_there_a_list_of_recommended_vps_providers1

reddit.com/r/VPS/comments/1s2122t/looking_for_very_stable_vps_provider_for_longterm1

reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/195s6ne/avoid_greencloud_vps1

reddit.com/r/webhosting/comments/1eg1r79/every_web_hosting_service_a_scam_bad_pricing1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Greencloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Greencloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at greencloud.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.