AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Google Public DNS · October 2026 Edition
Google Cloud · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Google Public DNS

16Judge labels
0First choices
15Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Google Public DNS was named 6 times in DNS filtering, where DNSFilter led with 59%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dns filtering · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Public DNS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
DNS filteringNetwork and edge0%94 of 94100%6under 10 labels · led by DNSFilter at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Public DNS yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Public DNS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500011
GPT-6 Luna00011
Muse Glimmer 30B00011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative15 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Problematic Providers to Avoid ... Google's DNS and OpenDNS employ tracking for their specific needs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DNS filtering · negative prompt · hard negative
“Google Public DNS, if minimizing data collection is your top priority... That's a disclosed tradeoff, not evidence that the service is unsafe.” GPT-6 Luna · DNS filtering · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution reason: While Google offers encrypted DNS, Google is fundamentally an advertising company that builds user profiles.” MiniMax M2.5 · DNS filtering · negative prompt · soft negative
“For privacy-first use this is usually avoided in favour of resolvers with shorter or no-log policies.” Muse Glimmer 30B · DNS filtering · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Public DNS, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Public DNS was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Quad98 of 164Not among the top eight
Cloudflare8 of 162Not among the top eight
NextDNS7 of 160Not among the top eight
Cloudflare Gateway5 of 160Not among the top eight
DNSFilter5 of 160Not among the top eight
OpenDNS5 of 160Not among the top eight
Cisco Umbrella4 of 162Not among the top eight
Control D3 of 161Not among the top eight
AdGuard DNS3 of 160Not among the top eight
CleanBrowsing2 of 160Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Public DNS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Google Public DNS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

controld.com9
bitlaunch.io7
developers.google.comYour site6
cybersecuritynews.com5
dnsfilter.com5
media.defense.gov5
privacyguides.org5
purple.ai5
avoidthehack.com4
captaindns.com4

Forty-nine of the fifty-five domain citations in answers naming Google Public DNS came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Google Public DNS stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
12,100 a month (“google public dns”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
33 a month
Its own site
It sits on Google Cloud's site (google.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 94 of 94 in DNS filtering
Segment leader
59%
DNSFilter
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
16 answers
Its own site cited
in 16 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Google Public DNS

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Public DNS; a claim can dispute any of them.
Google Public DNS (8.8.8.8 / 8.8.4.4) 1Google Public DNS (8.8.8.8) 1Google Public DNS 8.8.8.8 / 8.8.4.4 1

Follow Google Public DNS

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Google Cloud is the company behind Google Public DNS.
ShowHide
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Public DNS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Public DNS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Public DNS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Google Public DNS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Google Public DNS, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.