IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Firstbase · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Firstbase

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Firstbase was named 2 times in ITAM, where Snipe-IT led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market25 of 61

under the label threshold

Enterprise47 of 83

under the label threshold

In itam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Firstbase for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
IT asset management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	25 of 61	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Snipe-IT at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Firstbase yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Firstbase across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Firstbase if: Equipment logistics (procurement, shipping, retrieval, resale) is critical” Kimi K2 · ITAM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Firstbase, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Firstbase was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ServiceNow IT Asset Management3 of 32Not in the top three

Freshservice3 of 30Not in the top three

Lansweeper3 of 30Not in the top three

ManageEngine AssetExplorer3 of 30Not in the top three

Asset Panda2 of 30Not in the top three

Device422 of 30Not in the top three

Flexera One2 of 30Not in the top three

GoCodes2 of 30Not in the top three

Ivanti Neurons for ITAM2 of 30Not in the top three

Jira Service Management2 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Firstbase. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Firstbase and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudaware.com3

firstbase.comYour site3

forbes.com3

assetpanda.com2

console.com2

ninjaone.com2

virima.com2

worldmetrics.org2

assetmanagement.global1

dynamics.folio3.com1

Eighteen of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming Firstbase came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cloudaware.com/blog/asset-management-tools3

firstbase.com/learn/best-it-asset-management3

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-it-asset-management-software3

assetpanda.com/resource-center/compare/best-it-asset-management-software-top-itam-platform2

console.com/blog/best-it-asset-management-software2

ninjaone.com/blog/best-it-asset-management-software2

virima.com/blog/top-asset-management-tools-you-need-to-know-about2

worldmetrics.org/best/it-assets-management-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Firstbase's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Firstbase, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at firstbase.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.